This is a statement of (apparent) fact that the material possessions we might accumulate in our lives are not of any use or service when we die. It leaves open the question about where we might go when we die. It works equally well whether you believe that your body just stays in the ground, or that your spirit separates from your body and lives elsewhere, or that your body is resurrected at some point in the future. AA members are familiar with the quote that “the only thing we take from this world when we leave it is what we gave away” which gives us a hint about what to do with the insight that we can’t take it with us. Boston based marketing manager Aarti Khurana claims to have coined the phrase “while you are alive collect moments not things, earn respect, not money and enjoy love, not luxuries.”

Matthew 6:19-20
But store up for yourselves treasures in heaven,
where moth and rust do not destroy,
and where thieves do not break in and steal.

This teaching of Christ is echoed in 1 Timothy 6:7, “for we brought nothing into the world, so that we can take nothing out of it,” and by other verses. The idea that our access to wealth does not survive us is not just a statement of fact but a preamble to an ethic. Since this is the case, we are invited to be generous not only with our material wealth but with every ounce of our being. Pastors seeking sixty-five million dollars to buy a jet plane when the true [lack of] value of earthly treasures is so clearly identified ought to confuse the outside observer of Christianity. And while this is an extreme example that most of us can easily distance ourselves from, the actual challenge likely hits home on a daily basis. I recall a children's story in which the preacher pulled out a charge card that had a hologram of a dove on it and said he used that as a reminder of the Holy Spirit being involved in every penny he spent, or at least every time he used his charge card. Thirty odd years and counting that I think of this as I pull my own card out!

Views: 146

Comment by James C Schultz on 5th mo. 5, 2017 at 6:52pm

This sort of plays off your previous post of "never say die".  People often make decisions without regard for the probability of death.

Comment by Glenn Morison on 5th mo. 6, 2017 at 6:41pm

Put more foolishly, people often underestimate the probability of death but overestimate the uniqueness of death. 

Comment by James C Schultz on 5th mo. 7, 2017 at 1:53pm

Case in point  Had a conversation this morning about the anxiety some are subjecting themselves to by dwelling on the possible loss of health insurance while being oblivious to the Nuclear proliferation going on in North Korea and Iran. 

Comment by Forrest Curo on 5th mo. 7, 2017 at 4:58pm

Hey, the dangerous nuclear proliferation is going on in the United States. It's our leadership who've really mastered the art of Talking Crazy and Influencing People, while there are actually people in this country who believe our leadership. And far too few people with any idea of the inconveniences of life without a habitable environment.

Comment by Kirby Urner on 5th mo. 7, 2017 at 8:16pm

If we define wealth as the ability to supply life support to x humans for t time (xt) then it's a matter of getting the ball rolling in one lifetime, whether or not one has additional lifetimes in which to enjoy the fruits.  Others will.  Create wealth for others and pass it on.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby posted a blog post

Friends in Belize

Oscar Mmbali's NewsletterFebruary 2021…See More
12 hours ago
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Christ's living appearance within me has drawn me out of the reflective nature and the process…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"God is also more than anyone's experience of God. It's not that we can contain God in a…"
2nd month 26
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Hello Thomas, Through the immanent appearance of eternal life itself inshining upon me, I am drawn…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
2nd month 23
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
2nd month 23
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd month 22
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd month 22

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service