[memo to a listserv for faculty and Peace Corps vets, a couple typos fixed, I think I'll add this to Medium]

I was pleased to see the militaries colluding to put on a fun show for the vicious masses, eager for fireworks. TV voyeurs love a great spectacle. Many are whining they want more. They want to "rubbleize" Damascus. "Please please please give us more violence".


Choosing to attack supposed "chemical weapons facilities" was on paper reckless (if any toxic gases were really present), but clips show people milling about taking pictures, so it was more a case of destroying evidence of research programs, if there was any, not actual stockpiles. We'll never know at this point. How convenient.

Like Donald said, the missiles would be "smart" (with heavy quotes). And yes, Assad is "an animal", and so are we all, literally (no offense to non-humans, our moral betters to be sure).

No major media bring up the fine points of any War Powers act, as this exercise, like last year's (same time, same script) is all about getting the home folks used to Congress having no say, no responsibility, ala the military dictatorship model (president says go, military goes, no Congress required, just count on media to whip up some cheerleaders, any questioners are disloyal Russian trolls). 

Reality TV screenwriters know how to take it from script to reality directly, no need to involve cumbersome legislation. Lawmakers are boring. War is exciting. TV opinion shapers are eager for more war. They don't want any brakes to catharsis. Give the people their circus!

I'm used to living under martial law in the Philippines. This feels about the same. Very Banana Republic. Not a democracy, that's obvious, but in my experience Americans don't really care for democracy. They hunger to be militarized and show obedience.

Views: 64

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Howard Brod replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'The Earliest Quakers and liberal Quakerism' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Hi Kirby, I guess the question a liberal meeting might ask themselves regarding an outward form…"
4 hours ago
Kirby Urner posted a discussion

What is Primitive Christianity?

I gather from studying the thinking of others at this website, that we're encouraged to share our…See More
12 hours ago
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'No Quakers, Only Quakerism'
"I recognize other reasons for institutional email addresses e.g. clerk@multnomahmeeting.org --…"
14 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Help finding a specific word for a specific behavior.'
"More context needed.  A perfect stranger?  Mentally ill?"
14 hours ago
Kirby Urner replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'The Earliest Quakers and liberal Quakerism' in the group Liberal Quakers
"What happened in 1828 again?  Was that when Hicksites forked off from Gurneyites? Ah yes, I…"
14 hours ago
Howard Brod commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Help finding a specific word for a specific behavior.'
"malicious deceit (sorry, that's two words)"
4th day (Wed)
Volker Eulering updated their profile
4th day (Wed)
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

Help finding a specific word for a specific behavior.

Hello,Imagine this happened to you:You are reading a book on a park bench and someone walks up to…See More
4th day (Wed)

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service