This afternoon we watched a rerun of a retrospective — Oprah Winfrey's Where Are They Now? Oprah interviewed the widowed husband of a young woman who decided to move to Oregon so she could take advantage of the assisted dying legislation there. She was living with inoperable brain tumors.

This evening we watched a documentary on CBC about a young man with cystic fibrosis. He and his friends run a weekly podcast at of Halifax where they discuss the granular minutia of living in this world with a disability.

I'm not certain but it seems to me that Oprah's young woman married her husband before she had the diagnosis. The cancer and the diagnosis of cancer (which are different, I've been there with my wife) ripped through their lives. The young woman's husband spoke with some passion but also with tears about how important it was for her to live the life she had left by filling it up with positive experiences. He took great pride in the fact that she had made a decision to control her life and she had followed that decision through to its logical destination.

In contrast our young Canadian in Halifax married his wife when both knew he was living with a prognosis of at best two or three years. It's a subtle distinction — but the documentary presents him as filling his life not with positive experiences but with meaningful ones. For him connection to important other people and doing good work — giving — was what was important.

The contrasts are overly simplified. I'm certain that our young Canadian fills his life with positive experiences to and does what he can to limit the negative ones. And I am also certain that our young Californian ex-pats in Oregon on had meaningful experiences and gave and built connections. These two people are after all human beings and human beings don't get out of this life without connecting without making meaning without caring.

The difference is then are more in their rhetoric than in the living. It's how we speak about what we are trying to do with the time we have. And the person who chose to die, and the husband seeking to honour that memory, and Oprah Winfrey herself, present to the hero's him of her life in terms of autonomy and in terms of "good experiences". Our friend in Halifax in contrast chooses activities that make enduring the pain worthwhile — and they involve giving to others and shared moments.

Views: 58

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby liked David McKay's blog post 100 Bible Verses Most Frequently Quoted By Early Quakers
8 hours ago
Matthew Callow replied to Brad Ogilvie's discussion 'Is an opulent gay wedding really progress?' in the group Sexuality/ LGBT
"Friends have a ministry of bearing witness to marriage, which we see clearly in the Gospels and…"
yesterday
Dan McCracken updated their profile
6th day (Fri)
William F Rushby replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
6th day (Fri)
William F Rushby left a comment for David Keel
"David Keel asked: "Is that a photo of you in the car ?"  The answer is yes.  My…"
6th day (Fri)
David Keel replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Faith: The Great Big Puzzle'
"I think a big part of that missing puzzle of a Liberal Quaker is not having the light of Christ as…"
5th day (Thu)
David Keel left a comment for William F Rushby
"Hi William,  I became interested in George Fox as a younger Christian, and William Penn…"
5th day (Thu)
William F Rushby left a comment for David Keel
"David: Would you mind telling us about yourself and why you are interested in "the early forms…"
5th day (Thu)

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service