Mike King’s 2014 book Quakernomics: An Ethical Capitalism should interest anyone who wants to learn more about the history of 19th century British Quakers in business. Beyond that, the claim that the book provides “an immediately relevant guide for today’s global economy” should be treated with skepticism. 

The historical narrative that makes up the first half of the book is definitely interesting, but it is worth mentioning a couple of important concerns:

-          First, as one reviewer on Amazon notes there is little statistical evidence presented to back the author’s claim that Quakers were any more ethical than their counterparts. “it is difficult to know what percentage of Quakers followed the examples of looking after their workers that are given in the book. Similarly there is an impressive list of companies run by Quakers but do we really know how many in these Quaker ‘family’ firms were really practising Quakers? Without any figures it is difficult to make a judgement on the claims made… is it possible to say whether the percentage of Quaker employers who looked after their workers was significantly higher than the average?”

-          Second, his historical argument is that “Quakernomics…is a philosophy of wealth creation which sought from the outset to put its wealth to social ends” (128). While he does provide some examples of Quakers seeking changes in public policy, the bulk of his examples to support the idea of the social concerns of Quaker business owners (above average wages, model villages, hot chocolate instead of beer, etc.) are rooted in voluntary action and moral persuasion rather than legislation. This historical evidence is at odds with the author’s personal conviction (which informs the economic analysis in the second half of the book) that “the state must inexorably play a key role in the construction of an ethics for reining in raw capitalism” (255). 

You can read more here: http://quakerlibertarians.weebly.com/blog/quakernomics

Views: 354

Comment by Kirby Urner on 9th mo. 13, 2015 at 1:55pm

I've referenced that book quite a bit in leading interest groups on "What is Quakerism?" to groups of non-Quakers, example here:


The story these non-Quaker authors tell delightfully piggy-backs on science fiction already in the bag:  The Iron Bridge.  That helps keep the tone light and more literary.


Also apropos, George Bernard Shaw was looking to ridicule and/or satirize the socially responsible businessman but shied away from using Cadbury, not evil enough to make his point:

(see ending paragraph)

What I get from the book is how business-oriented Quakerism was and therefore still could be or even is in some respects.

One need not dig too deeply to impress a newcomer with this orientation, given the prominence of Meetings for [Worship for] Business Meeting and emphasis on check-and-balance workflows among committees (talking unprogrammed here, what they had in the 1790s, more than pastor-led). 

A finely tuned Meeting could manage millions if not billions in assets, with processes already on the books or within reach of innovation, would be my contention.  Ethically?  That may be a function of Meeting depth, more than simply design i.e. that depends on the Meeting.

Kirby Urner
Co-clerk IT Committee / NPYM


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Hank Breitenkam, aka Brother Joy updated their profile
13 hours ago
Hank Breitenkam, aka Brother Joy posted a photo
13 hours ago
Beau Belle liked Sarah Spencer's group Online Quaker Studies
5th day (Thu)
Beau Belle updated their profile
5th day (Thu)
Christopher Hatton updated their profile
4th day (Wed)
Christopher Hatton replied to Isabel Penraeth's discussion 'Semi-programmed?'
"Dear Isabel, I realise this is an old thread, but just to let you know that I have begun to offer /…"
4th day (Wed)
William F Rushby replied to Jean Yeager's discussion 'Why Do Primitive Quakers Cling to Traditition?'
"My paper on  "Ann Branson and the Eclipse of Oracular Ministry in Nineteenth Century…"
11th month 30
William F Rushby replied to Jean Yeager's discussion 'Why Do Primitive Quakers Cling to Traditition?'
11th month 30

© 2019   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service