This was written a number of years ago and I might change the wording slightly for today, but I have decided to post it essentially unedited.

A Friends School as a Whole Community


If we love God, we will be satisfied with nothing less than a fellowship which hears and obeys the call of Christ to righteousness within the community. The life of this fellowship will be grounded in the corporate
experience of obedience and suffering for the sake of obedience. This does not
happen when we are with those who tell us only what we want to hear of our own
accomplishments and glory, nor does it happen in a community whose intent is to
glorify or build up specific individuals. An obedient fellowship is clearly
evident only in a primary community, one in which the first claim on our
corporate loyalty is the community that has become the social force that has
the greatest influence in our lives. As faculty in a Friends school this means
viewing our position not as a job to finance what we really want to do nor one
to trade-in for a “better” position, but rather as an experience in forming and
belonging to a whole community. As students it is not putting up with the
situation until graduation, but it is considering the school as our community
now. This is not to say that faculty and others may not be led to other
opportunities or that students should not prepare for further study or “life
after school,” but that these occurrences are outcomes of the experience rather
than immediate goals. It also does not mean that all of the members must agree
with everything that the school stands for or in reality does. However, it does
mean exerting our present efforts toward achieving a primary community in which
each one is a whole person. This is not making the school what we want or what
a select group of persons want, but rather what God wants and we need.


Now for some tough questions. How do we know what is needed? How do we know how to meet these needs? How do we know God’s will for our school? Friends have insisted that it is in corporate meeting that we can find
the truth, in coming together, all of us, seeking unity not uniformity, as a
community sharing our concerns, our successes and our problems. The source of
Power for early Friends was discovered and experienced in Meeting one another
and God at a depth beyond words. Discovered in meeting across all disciplines,
ages and positions within the community.


The prophetic tradition placed the direct experience of God as the most critical point in the relationship of persons with God and with each other. From this experience comes personal righteousness and active
involvement in meeting and sharing with others. The major barrier to a right
relationship with God and one another has been proclaimed as our resistance and
down right rebellion against the worship of God in Spirit and in Truth. We
have, just as institutional churches past and present, substituted
intermediaries, symbols, rituals and forms for a direct relationship within our
community. We expect certain individuals or groups to perform special acts
while others are mere spectators. We have set aside time for the form of
meeting without incorporating Meeting into the classroom or business of running
the school. Friends found that it was in Meeting with everyone as active
participants in a direct immediate relationship that Power came for personal
and corporate righteousness through the sense of unity and power essential to a
whole community.


If we are to develop a living primary community, we must meet each other under the leadership of the Spirit of Christ. We must meet each other not as students, staff, alumni, administrators, or teachers of one
discipline or another. In other words, we must meet as individuals rather than
on the basis of position, title or experience. Each one of us is capable of
listening to the teaching of Christ and of contributing in a Meeting for
Worship, Meeting for Business, and Meeting for Learning. It is in this context
that we can become whole persons in a whole community. Some of the results that
might be expected from such a school community, with thanks and apologies to
Howard Brinton, are: 1) A sense of belonging to a community that implies
cooperation rather than competition; 2) A sense of inclusive wholeness rather
than exclusive separation or compartmentalization; 3) A renewed sense of
dedication and commitment on the part of students, staff and administration; 4)
A sense of caring with nonviolent discipline and methods emphasizing persons
more than facts or things; 5) An inward sense of rightness in individuals with
values meaning more than material value; 6) A sense of equality among academic
areas with interdisciplinary inclusion rather than exclusiveness or
possessiveness; 7) A sense of simplicity in life styles and corporate direction
with emphasis on the needs of individuals rather than corporate or  individual prestige; 8) A sense of
honesty in achieving creativity rather than conformity in academic standards
and interpersonal relationships; and 9) A sense of broadening and strengthening
the skills students need for life rather than refining and narrowing limited
areas of interest.


In such a community, the goals will not be differentiated from the means by which these goals are attained. The process of education will be the product of the school and students will become part of the process of
the community. Meeting will be for Worship, Business, and Learning in a whole
community which is made up  of whole

Views: 305

Replies to This Discussion

I like this!


Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby commented on William F Rushby's blog post 'From John Woolman on Ministry'
"Keith Saylor: Thanks for your great effort!"
Keith Saylor commented on William F Rushby's blog post 'From John Woolman on Ministry'
"Hello William, I'm still getting my feet under this project. However, a path is clearing as I…"
6th day (Fri)
Mike Shell left a comment for Marcia P Roberts
"Friend Marcia. I don't visit QuakerQuaker much at present, but thanks for…"
6th day (Fri)
Mike Shell posted a discussion

An Exposition of Laozi’s “Essence of Dao” by Yun Choi Yeung

Yun Choi Yeung is from Hong Kong and has been living in the United Kingdom since October 2010. In…See More
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor commented on William F Rushby's blog post 'From John Woolman on Ministry'
"Summary, Observations, and Considerations John Woolman's Journal Chapter 8 Paragraph One In…"
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'From: The Ear of the Soul ...'
"I appreciate this information William."
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor commented on William F Rushby's blog post 'From John Woolman on Ministry'
"Last minute changes. For various reasons I have created a independent framework for Woolman's…"
3rd day (Tue)
William F Rushby replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'From: The Ear of the Soul ...'
"Branson uses the "ear of my soul" 29 times in her journal, more than any other writer,…"
6th month 29

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service