NOTE: This is basically a cross-post from The Good Raised Up. I'm not too familiar with social networking tools or its online etiquette. If I'm out of line for cross-posting, let me know. --Liz

---------------
In early September 2008, I wrote a post about how we in the blogosphere might broaden the conversation about the interest in Convergent Friends and about the growing sense of Quaker renewal that has been helped by the online conversation.

After having had a conversation with a Quaker acquaintance who is involved in the world of Quaker publishing, I felt a sort of courage grow within me:

It now seems time for me to take the next step toward the publication of a compilation of blog posts.

The publication would be a sort of "reader," similar in format to Martin Kelley's self-published Quaker Ranter Reader from 2005.

What follows below are the details of how to submit blog posts of your own as well as how to nominate blog posts that you would like to be considered for inclusion in the publication. So even if you are a lurker--or especially if you are lurker!--you can have a role in shaping the contents of the final product.

Blessings,
Liz Opp(enheimer)

P.S. I'd like to think that even if every reader here submits or nominates only one post, we'd have more than enough items to consider for the book!

P.P.S. It's likely that the phrase "Convergent Friends Reader" will be a tag or subtitle and not the actual title of the publication itself. Suggestions for titles welcome!

And Another Thing. I'll probably be in touch with a number of you personally and directly, asking for your own thoughts and encouraging you to consider what posts of yours or of someone else's do you seem to return to? Which posts seem to have been working on you, in your heart, mind, or spirit?

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Call for submissions.

All Quaker bloggers and blog readers are encouraged to submit or nominate blog posts by March 15, 2009 that exemplify the "convergent conversation" that has been occurring online in recent years.

PURPOSE:
To provide a printed quality publication of a sampling of online writing that represents the convergent conversation among Friends.

To provide greater access to these online writings to Friends meetings, Friends churches, and Quaker individuals who may not have easy access to the internet or who may prefer print media over electronic media.

To provide an easier way for Friends' faith communities to refer to and discuss ideas contained in these online writings (e.g. study groups).

DETAILS: In keeping with the purpose of this publication, all submissions and nominations must be blog posts, must have the permission from the blog writer to be considered, and must not have appeared elsewhere in print. (We wish to avoid the complication of dealing with copyrights, permissions, etc.)

LENGTH: Length is not a primary consideration: As in vocal ministry during worship, the nature of the content and substance are more important than length, since some of the shortest posts (messages) can raise significant points for reflection and can help advance, deepen, or enrich the conversation.

HYPERLINKS: All links that appear in the original blog post must be footnoted to include either the corresponding URL or a relevant remark intended by the original link or both.

Links that appear in the original blog post may be omitted [changed into plain text] within the submission at the discretion of the blogger.

Links in posts that are *nominated* will be left to the writer of the original blog post when possible or otherwise will be dealt with at the discretion of the editors.

TOPICS: Submissions and nominated posts can cover a range of topics that is as broad as the Quaker blogosphere itself.

Keep in mind the purpose of the publication. Just because a blog post exists online doesn't mean it speaks to the intended theme of this publication.

EXAMPLES OF TOPICS:

Personal story
Personal concerns
Meeting for Worship
Faith and practice
Membership
Quaker schisms and branches
Quaker language and terminology
Theology
The Testimonies
Families and children
First Day School
Adult Young Friends
Quaker renewal
History and early Friends
Scripture
Witness

NUMBER OF SUBMISSIONS or NOMINATIONS: There is no upper limit. However, if it's helpful to have one, how about we say that each blogger can submit up to four posts of her or his own choosing; and each person who nominates blog posts can nominate up to six (assuming the nominations will not be from the same single blogger).

DEADLINE: March 15, 2009. Our hope is to have this publication available at the 2009 FGC Gathering! Get your submissions and nominations to us by March 15, 2009 to allow us to review the blog posts and begin the self-publishing process.

HOW TO SUBMIT or NOMINATE BLOG POSTS: Send the following information to lizoppATgmailDOTcom:

Blogger's name
Blog post's title
Blog post's URL


FOR MORE INFORMATION: Please email lizoppATgmailDOTcom directly

Views: 31

Reply to This

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby left a comment for Olaf Radicke
"Welcome, Olaf!  "
1 hour ago
Olaf Radicke updated their profile
7 hours ago
Diane Kerchner liked QuakerQuaker's group Plainness & Simplicity
10th month 21
Diane Kerchner liked William F Rushby's discussion Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends
10th month 21
Rainer Möller posted a blog post

Quakers unto the Civil War

My personal impression is that Quakers, like all abolitionists, enthusiastically took part in the…See More
10th month 19
Rainer Möller replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Two Narratives in American Society'
"Following this review Macaes' seems to say that before our times, when "Liberalism"…"
10th month 19
William F Rushby replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I think there is a relatively small elite at the top of the power structure of unprogrammed…"
10th month 18
Forrest Curo replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"The main Quaker hierarchy today are those who learn to manipulate "Quaker Process"."
10th month 18

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service