The blog post that was sharing around today by Johan Maurer touched me on a deep level. 

One of my personal tenants of my faith has been to "die unto yourself everyday". Which I interpret to mean that every morning I must rise out of bed being humbled and needing to be aware of how much I don't know about how much I do not know. In my marriage, my mothering, my faith, and the world around me. 

My frustration on my path in Quakerism is this struggle to accept that the current Quaker think ( At least in PYM) is that "We are the best. We have all the answers and everyone else is uneducated in the truth. Might it be that there is still a large group of people who DO NOT think this way and would rather see our meetings open to the idea that we are worse off now in our understanding of our direction than we have ever been.

Today a Clerk of a committee reached out to me to help promote their project. I KNOW that the current way it is being presented is divisive, uninformed, pretentious and just plain exclusionary, but that isn't what they want. They want me to be a "yes man" So I am lost. I am lost to figuring out what to do. I want to help. But actually help them. Not just work their ideas how they want because "They know they are right" On the other hand I want to feel "worthy" enough to be included. That doesn't sit right with me. 

Quakers DO have a well deserved reputation for moving in the right direction BUT I am very worried they are landing right in the middle of Idolism. It is one thing to take on the mantle of the work done by those that have come before. But it is entirely another to assume that we now hold all of the "correct" and "true" knowledge. Pride goes before a fall. We all best spend some time thinking of that before it is too late.

Quakers MUST take on an influx of new people and ideas if they have any hope of survival.

So first I would ask all of my fellow Quakers to hold me in the light and ask for God to speak to my condition and guide me. 

Secondly I am interested to hear others tell their own stories about when Quakerism had collided with your own messages from God and what steps you took to reconcile that. I am open to all of it. And I have faith that someone will speak through God to me. 

Views: 247

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I see Quakers collectively as mostly bumbling, well-intentioned, but somewhat clueless.

What hardens a Friend in a good way, in the sense of developing discipline, is to wear that Quaker badge (which raises expectations) and then take on real challenges in collusion (I use the word advisedly) with non-Quakers. 

Given we're a small and esoteric sect (I'm proud of that, no change needed), it's our networking with non-Quakers that defines us and our future. 

AFSC has been one vehicle for that hardening but certainly not the only one. WILPF and PSR come to mind, as organizations wherein our Quaker household overlaps these others.

I also got to be friends with Ed Applewhite (Googleable) which sparked lots of useful conversation.

Two Kirbys meet.  Doesn't happen everyday. :-D

Reply to Discussion


Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby posted a blog post

Friends in Belize

Oscar Mmbali's NewsletterFebruary 2021…See More
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Christ's living appearance within me has drawn me out of the reflective nature and the process…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"God is also more than anyone's experience of God. It's not that we can contain God in a…"
2nd month 26
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Hello Thomas, Through the immanent appearance of eternal life itself inshining upon me, I am drawn…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
2nd month 23
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
2nd month 23
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd month 22
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd month 22

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service