I make Historic Clothing-copies of garments from history. I attend meetings and events of Living History groups where everyone I see is wearing clothing from the era the group covers. For many years I have contemplated moving into the field of Historic Plain Dress (female only, as I never took the 7-year-long Master tailoring course.) But whether I do that or not, I'm left with a dilemma; As a professional costumer, is wearing Plain Dress myself a witness, or advertising?

(I wore Plain Dress from the 1830s for a few college semesters, until my then-husband objected. Loudly. Often.)

As if the issue of Plain dress were not complicated enough, I also wear and teach historic clothing at meetings of the Living History group to which I belong.  I have "outgrown" my once-legendary collection of upper-class Tudor clothing, dripping with silks and jewels, that was both my pride and my best advertising. I already know I will never go back to those excesses, but what replaces them? Why? How soon?

Views: 165

Comment by Barra Jacob-McDowell on 7th mo. 11, 2011 at 1:16am



I can identify with your dilemma. As a professional, traditional Celtic storyteller specializing in Scottish and Welsh tales and music, performing as "Barra the Bard", I often dress as a Scotswoman of ca.1745 in my airsaid (see picture!) at Highland Games, festivals and other events. I feel a drawing towards Plain Dress, but don't want others to think of it as a costume, that is, just worn as one instead of as a witness. Also, I was given almost an entire wardrobe of almost-new clothing (including several suits) by a late friend at a time when I really needed them...and since I've been jobhunting for over a year, and it's hard to find a job, I'm uneasy about how much employers would be willing to hire me for a front-desk position if I look too different. Paul Gallico wrote in one of his cat novels that a cat's motto was "When in doubt, wash." My inclination is to wait until I see more clearly.  But it IS a concern.

Comment by Martin Kelley on 7th mo. 11, 2011 at 10:50am
I read an academic article that said that popular contemporary ideas of Quaker plainness have more to do with historic re-enactors dressing up for special days at their meeting than to their actual plain-dressing ancestors. The modern Friends would pull the clothes from their attic and insist that these were the uniform of earlier Friends, whereas there weren't strict uniforms. If you read the old testimony, there's no dress requirements listed--it's all a state of mind, a readyness to wait in meekness toward God.
Comment by Honour Horne-Jaruk on 7th mo. 11, 2011 at 4:20pm
True, there were no "uniforms" in the military sense of the word; but there were standards common to each Yearly Meeting area, and departing from those standards too widely could, and did, get you read out of Meeting. The problem is that those standards kept changing. In 1801, wearing a high-waisted gown in a light color was a major, and dangerous, deviation. By 1830 _not_ wearing one was.
Comment by Honour Horne-Jaruk on 7th mo. 11, 2011 at 6:10pm

Correction: 1820.



You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Diane Kerchner liked QuakerQuaker's group Plainness & Simplicity
4th day (Wed)
Diane Kerchner liked William F Rushby's discussion Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends
4th day (Wed)
Rainer Möller posted a blog post

Quakers unto the Civil War

My personal impression is that Quakers, like all abolitionists, enthusiastically took part in the…See More
10th month 19
Rainer Möller replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Two Narratives in American Society'
"Following this review Macaes' seems to say that before our times, when "Liberalism"…"
10th month 19
William F Rushby replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I think there is a relatively small elite at the top of the power structure of unprogrammed…"
10th month 18
Forrest Curo replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"The main Quaker hierarchy today are those who learn to manipulate "Quaker Process"."
10th month 18
Keith Saylor commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'In the Life itself the need for prophets and prophecies is fulfilled.'
"Your testimony to the witness of immanent power and presence of the inshining Light and Life is a…"
10th month 18
Karl Malchut liked QuakerQuaker's group Liberal Quakers
10th month 17

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service