Primitive Christianity Revived, Again
I’ve always felt a certain discomfort about Nontheist Friends and other dually-affiliated Friends. (But, you protest, aren’t you a dually-affiliated Friend?? Yes, but I don’t identify as a Buddhist Quaker or a Quaker Buddhist: I am both a Buddhist and a Quaker.) Some of this discomfort about Nontheist Friends stemmed from preconceptions I, as a theist* (more on that later), had. A few weeks ago, I joined a Nontheist Friends Google group. At the time, I was questioning my belief in God. I’d recently come across several passages in Buddhist books that described theism as, basically, the adult version of a blankie: the belief in a supernatural being that could, at a moment’s notice, if one prayed hard enough, fix all of your problems. This was not my kind of theism, so I began to wonder if I might actually be one of those “nontheist Friends” I actually mocked with another Friend a few years ago...
Here’s the thing: while I am a Buddhist, I don’t expect my Quaker Meeting to be Buddhist. I don’t expect messages delivered in Meeting for Worship to be given in Buddhist terms. I don’t–and wouldn’t, unless I had a very, very clear sense of being Led–give ministry in Meeting for Worship using Buddhist terms.
Quakerism, while it is a faith where anyone can join us in worship, no matter what they do or not believe, is a religion rooted in Christian mysticism. Historically, those are our roots. And what concerns me about this Friend’s comment is I worry that some dually-affiliated Friends may be trying to deny those roots. Again, I do not believe that one needs to be Christian to be a Quaker. (I do not identify as a Christian.) But I do feel that one needs to understand and respect Quakerism’s Christian roots. Quaker language and tradition have evolved from these roots, to be sure, but the roots are there.
(Full post here: http://thefriendlyfunnel.quakerism.net/2011/07/10/thoughts-on-duall...)
Comment by Jon on 7th mo. 29, 2011 at 7:29pm
Comment by funnel101 on 7th mo. 29, 2011 at 7:46pm
Comment by funnel101 on 7th mo. 30, 2011 at 12:44pm
Comment by James C Schultz on 8th mo. 25, 2011 at 5:24pm Mat 13:52
You might find this scripture verse worth some meditation and then again you might not. Just a suggestion.
Then said he unto them, Therefore every scribe which is instructed unto the kingdom of heaven is like unto a man that is an householder, which bringeth forth out of his treasure things new and old.
Comment by Jon on 8th mo. 26, 2011 at 1:41am
Comment by James C Schultz on 8th mo. 26, 2011 at 5:30pm The way this scripture was first explained to me was that god will reveal things to us by using both the old and new testaments. As I have read other inspired works I have come to find that my understanding of the old and new testaments is enlarged by revelations of how these other writings and teachings confirm what I have been shown through the bible. Sometimes we think we know what something says and then we read it in a new translation or under new circumstances and the Holy
Spirit opens it up even more. The more we open ourselves up to divine writings and teachings the more we are able to know God or approach the Divine. The caveat is of course that not everything that claims to be divinely inspired is but if we are honest with God He will lead us into all truth.
Comment
QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.
Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List
Support:
Make a One-Time Online Donation (Paypal)
David Nelson Seaman replied to Missy's discussion 'Where's the Quaker in Quaker?'
Julie DeMarchi Heiland commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'The Never-Changing Case for Marriage'© 2012 Created by QuakerQuaker.
You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!
Join QuakerQuaker