This Beggar's Hands Overflow With Largess...

We think the story of 'the Prodigal Son' is about a repenting sinner finding forgiveness.

Okay. It's about that.

Jesus in Matthew, reembodied after his death, says that his disciples should go back to Galilee, and expect to find him there.

In Luke, instead, he meets the disciples at a village near Jerusalem, and tells them: "Stay here in the city until you have been clothed with power from on high." Whereupon, in Acts, we eventually get that incident at Pentecost.

Although it's possible to harmonize the two accounts, I'm more inclined to see them as evidence that both accounts were constructed later, possibly reflecting different people's differing experiences-- but anyway not being written down until after Paul's rather bare description. They aren't, in other words, direct evidence of The Resurrection but rather different people's efforts to describe what had happened 'after the fact'. We're relying, so far as we can tell, on hearsay here-- and not really adding much to Paul's intuition that God had vindicated Jesus by raising him from death and seating him "at God's right hand," that is, putting God's power to work for the program Jesus had proclaimed. Paul expected this to be manifest "soon" on a massive scale; it looks from here as if his timetable was off... but trees and historical developments develop at their own pace.

Jesus was supposed, by one traditional view, to serve as God's correction of What Went Wrong back in The Garden.

What did go wrong? Was it merely human wickedness breaking loose?

That 'Prodigal Son' was not supposed to have been particularly "wicked". He just wanted to take his share of his father's wealth, and go his own way.

So he ended up outside the Promised Land, surrounded by goyim, living at their mercy by their ways--even earning his living by herding their swine (These swine were not at all kosher!) and getting hungry enough to eat their food.

"Sin"? Not what we normally think of in that connection-- but certainly describing a radical disconnect from God.

We moderns look at what we and our fellow-humans keep doing to the Earth, and we know (so far as we can bear to look) that it isn't right; it isn't at all as God intended.

And then we sit down and try to think about the best way to deal with the situation. "What can I write about how we're going wrong and what to do about it?" We look for good strategies and try to implement them. We wonder why we can't do what we think the times demand. "My mind is an utter blank! Why can't I write about this?!"

Sometimes one just has to wait until the real power is ready to use us.

Views: 37

Comment by Rosemary Gould on 5th mo. 25, 2010 at 6:20pm
Thanks, Forrest.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"If everyone were continually consciously aware of the presence of God, we wouldn't need…"
16 hours ago
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Through the power and presence of the spirit of Jesus Christ in my conscience and consciousness, it…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo posted a discussion

Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?

[This is from my reaction to a discussion re George Keith on facebook. Thoughts?]The core…See More
2nd day (Mon)
Forrest Curo commented on Rainer Möller's blog post 'Quakers unto the Civil War'
"As I understand it, a lot of young men -- being young men -- went off eagerly to join in a battle…"
2nd day (Mon)
Rainer Möller commented on Rainer Möller's blog post 'Quakers unto the Civil War'
"As Wikipedia tells us, Whittier wrote a book "In War Time" 1864. Has anyone here read it?…"
1st day (Sun)
Rainer Möller left a comment for William F Rushby
"Hi William, thanks for the reminder of Wikipedia. They don't tell us much, but I see that…"
1st day (Sun)
William F Rushby left a comment for Rainer Möller
"Rainer |Moller describes himself as "Not literal enough to a good Anabaptist. Not liberal…"
1st day (Sun)
William F Rushby commented on Rainer Möller's blog post 'Quakers unto the Civil War'
""Does someone know how Whittier developed from that point onwards? I cannot think that he…"
1st day (Sun)

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service