If we as humans reject the horrific unethical beliefs of many Muslims, Christians, and Hindus (Part #1 The Horror of God Belief), and we already have rejected delusions and fanciful mythological stories of religions in general as various thoughtful theists have done since Plato...
HOW 
do we go about thinking of Ultimate Reality 
(usually and traditionally termed “God”)?

Ah, the God question. 

WHY?

Nothing like trying to solve the nature of existence, billions of years of cosmic history, why the Big Bang happened, and why is it possible (to paraphrase Einstein) that mere primates came to self-aware consciousness
and the ability for creativity, reason, 
science, aesthetics, 
and compassion.










The how is often answered by cosmologists speculating about multi-verses and quantum events. Fascinating stuff. As for humanity’s sometime action of altruism, evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins speculates that ethical ideal might have come about by a “misfiring” of evolution.

However open agnostics such as the astronomer Chris Impey of the University of Arizona-Tucson raise very good questions about the unusual anomaly of Homo sapiens in the midst of what appears to be an unconscious, thoughtless, amoral cosmos. 

Astronomer Impey: “If the universe contained nothing more than forces operating on inanimate matter, it would not 
be very interesting." 

"The presence of sentient life-forms like us 
(and perhaps unlike us) is the zest, or 
the special ingredient, that gives cosmic 
history dramatic tension." 



"We’re made 
of tiny subatomic particles and are part 
of a vast space-time arena, yet 
we hold both extremes 
in our heads.”
How It Ends? By Chris Impey




Yes, the amazing ability of conscious primates to hold the concept of the macrocosm to the microcosm within each of our heads, to create new things which never existed, to have a sense of ought which often thwarts what is biologically advantageous….

So if we humans want to move beyond our personal feelings and inner intuition in regard to God, we need to look to brilliant philosophical thinkers. 

While atheist thinkers have posited that everything is due to cosmic 
Chance (Jacques Monad, Stephen Jay Gould) or 
Necessity/Determinism (Sam Harris, Jerry Coyne),
in striking contrast mathematician/philosopher 
Alfred Lord Whitehead
and philosopher Charles Hartshorne
think that Meaning and Creativity and the Good 
are at the center 
and beginning of 
everything. 

Consciousness, reason, ethics, aesthetics are somehow inherent 
in the essential essence of the cosmos, 
not meaningless anomalies like atheists claim.


Since Charles Hartshorne comes from a Quaker background, attended Haverford Quaker College
and is the most recent brilliant theistic thinker,
let’s first take a look at him 
and his concepts and philosophy 
which he terms, 
panentheism.





Earliest Spiral Galaxy

For Hartshorne, the future is OPEN. Creativity, possibility are there. God and all conscious life have real alternative choices to create.

For instance,
"When Scrooge, in Dickens’ A Christmas Carol, asks the Ghost of Christmas Future whether he is seeing the shadows of the things that “will be” or the shadows of the things that “may be only,” he is expressing in a precise way Hartshorne’s analysis of future tense statements." 

"If the shadows are of the things that “will be,” then all hope is lost, but if they are the shadows of the things that “may be only” then Scrooge can change his ways and make for himself a different future."


"A hallmark of Hartshorne’s neoclassical theism is that the universe is a joint creative product of (a) the lesser creators that are the creatures, localized in space and time, and (b) the eminent creator which is God whose influence extends to every creature that ever has or that ever will exist."

By Donald Wayne Viney, Pittsburg State University

http://www.iep.utm.edu/hart-d-t/


"Charles Hartshorne, (born June 5, 1897, Kittanning, Pennsylvania, U.S.—died October 10, 2000, Austin, Texas), American philosopher, theologian, and educator known as the most influential proponent of a “process philosophy,” which considers God a participant in cosmic evolution."

"The descendant of Quakers and son of an Episcopalian minister, Hartshorne attended Haverford College before serving as a medical orderly in World War I. He completed his undergraduate education at Harvard University...earned a doctorate in philosophy in 1923. Hartshorne studied in Germany (1923–25), where he met Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl." 

"He returned to lecture at Harvard (1925–28), after which he taught philosophy at the University of Chicago (1928–55) and at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia (1955–62). He then taught...philosophy at the University of Texas--Austin...He also served as president of the American Philosophical Association and the Metaphysical Society of America."

http://www.britannica.com/biography/Charles-Hartshorne


*Side Note: Of course, some thoughtful people come to the conclusion there is no Ultimate Source/Essence. Nontheist and atheistic Quakers, Christian nontheists, religious atheists—all claim that there is no Essence, no Transcendence. Only matter and energy reign. It appears that they use religious language to describe their feelings and subjective preferences, nothing more. If you would like to read about nontheism, check back in to some of my posts on that subject.

To be continued--









In the Light,

Daniel Wilcox

Views: 31

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

David McKay replied to Sarah Spencer's discussion 'What's your experience of Quaker learning online?' in the group Online Quaker Studies
"Is QuakerStudies.org still alive?"
yesterday
David McKay liked Sarah Spencer's group Online Quaker Studies
yesterday
David McKay liked QuakerQuaker's group Conservative Friends
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Scott Martin's discussion 'Why Would They Want to Come?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Howard, clearly there was a strong mystical center to Jesus' Messages. Equally clearly, they…"
yesterday
Isaac Smith liked Scott Martin's discussion Why Would They Want to Come?
4th day (Wed)
Howard Brod replied to Scott Martin's discussion 'Why Would They Want to Come?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Thank you Scott for putting into words the truth about our spiritual tradition that perhaps most of…"
4th day (Wed)
Forrest Curo replied to Scott Martin's discussion 'Why Would They Want to Come?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I've heard the "Those people don't like this kind of worship!" argument raised…"
4th day (Wed)
Tom Smith replied to Scott Martin's discussion 'Why Would They Want to Come?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"As an "introverted intuitive" (INTJ) I identify with many of these comments. However, I…"
4th day (Wed)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service