The rule, government and authority of immanent Presence fractures the rule, government, and authority of algorithmically established engagement..

The rule, government and authority of immanent Presence fractures the rule, government, and authority of algorithmically established engagement.


In a recent post on Twitter Julian Assange wrote of the process of algorithmically preying on the people’s existing biases to increases engagement.


An algorithm is defined broadly as a step by step procedure or function for solving a problem or accomplishing an some end within a finite number of steps.


A consciousness and conscience that enters into, identifies with, and participates in the process of establishing a set of finite inputs and permissible outputs (a function) to manage, guide, instruct, or inform, the management of human relationships and interactions within a group is a consciousness and conscience that gains, meaning, purpose, and identity, from engagement with and participation in those finite sets of input and permissible outputs. Those finite sets of input and permissible outputs guide and inform the consciousness and conscience relative to human interaction and relationships. Those whose meaning, purpose, and identity are guided and informed by a particular set of infinite inputs and permissible outputs find unity with other human beings who share their finite inputs and permissible outputs and they are in disunity with those who do not share their finite inputs and permissible outputs.


Political, Religious, and Media leaders are able to influence, guide, and engage people algorithmically because there are many people (by their own admission) in this world whose consciousness, conscience, meaning, purpose, and identity, are guided and informed from within the process of outwardly established finite sets and permissible outputs. Memes, agendas, contrivances, sermons, reporting, etc. work and influence because a people’s consciousness and conscience are informed by identification with particular and specific finite sets and permissible outputs. For example, Donald Trump and Barack Obama are able to illicit both engagement and disengagement with them and political activity in general based upon the particular set of finite inputs they promote and the permissible outputs they promise. For example, those who identify with the political contrivances of Obama are guided and informed by him and his outward political constructs. Those who identify with the political contrivance of Trump are guided and informed by the outward constructs he professes and promotes.


There is a different way that breaks out of the algorithmically established process. In this way a consciousness and conscience is come out of the very process of identification with and participation with outwardly established finite sets of input and permissible outputs and a consciousness comes into identification with and participation in infinite immanent Presence. The discovery of immanent Presence, through its appearance in the consciousness and conscience, fractures human being’s connection to the process of identification with and participation in to finite sets of input and permissible outputs and establishes human being in the direct immediate guidance, rule, authority, and governance of infinite immanent Presence itself in itself. The result of the experience of immanent Presence in the consciousness and conscience is the discovery of coming out of a way of being that is guided and informed by outward political, religious, and media leaders and the finite sets of inputs and permissible outcomes they contrive, promote, and profess.


The direct and immediate experience of immanent Presence in a consciousness and conscience is the governance and rule through the direct experience of the relative immanent illumination of Presence itself in itself. The illumination, which is not Presence but the manifest impulse of Immanence itself, guides the consciousness and conscience relative to its experienced increase or decrease; so that, in any give human interaction, the relative motion away form or illumination of Presence within the consciousness and conscience guides or informs that action. An increase in the relative motion or illumination of immanent Presence affirms the action without any reference to a finite set of inputs or permissible outputs. The process of algorithmically informed governance and guidance is come out of and the discovery the different way of the governance of direct and immediate infinite Presence itself in itself is come into.

Views: 26

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Mike Widney updated their profile
21 hours ago
Josh Nichols updated their profile
7th day (Sat)
Josh Nichols updated their profile photo
7th day (Sat)
Josh Nichols posted a photo
7th day (Sat)
Christopher Hatton liked James C Schultz's discussion God's will or mine
6th day (Fri)
Mike Shell commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Rescuing Romans 13:1-7 – How do we answer authoritarian use of these words?'
"Thanks, David. Your post is…"
4th day (Wed)
Mike Shell commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Rescuing Romans 13:1-7 – How do we answer authoritarian use of these words?'
4th day (Wed)
Mike Shell commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Rescuing Romans 13:1-7 – How do we answer authoritarian use of these words?'
"Thanks again, Randy. I feel modern Christians misunderstand and misuse Paul, because they read him…"
4th day (Wed)

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service