If a Meeting takes a stand on any significant issue whatsoever it excludes (and temporarily alienates) people who see the matter otherwise.

If a Meeting can not take a stand on matters causing great suffering (and there is always disagreement about these, or someone would have simply corrected them) we seem to fall short of a basic Christian duty.

A possible resolution to this might look like what we did (as I heard it) with the Quaker House in Ulster. Of two warring groups, both considered the Quakers to be neutral and disinterested. As the leaders of these groups grew old, and tired beyond tired of losing people they loved, they started slipping in the back door of the Quaker House. Remarkably, there'd be someone there from the other side who'd just snuck in. It was the one place they could talk.

They were not, of course, just sitting there being silent at each other...

I think we've become far too much afraid of offending each other. (If you can't offend your Friends, you'll have to offend someone else? That doesn't sound right either.)

"We agree to disagree (so just shut up, allright!!!)"? We may be better off with ongoing bickering, yes? At least then we wouldn't have to feel that something we hold dear is socially unacceptable. (Maybe it is? Yeah, we're weird creatures, aren't we?)

Bearing with each other is an essential piece of this. A sufficient piece?

I fear it leaves out one difficult, outright painful duty -- We have to seriously wonder, each time, whether there's something about the issue our silly opponent has somehow gotten right, while we've utterly missed it....

Ridiculous, wasn't it? Okay, we're all done now, aren't we? Uh, aren't we? oh oh...
 

Views: 99

Comment by Kirby Urner on 4th mo. 6, 2017 at 2:29pm

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Sonja Darai replied to Chris Marcus's discussion 'Quakers featured in novels'
"I think this is the comprehensive list of mentioned books in this thread.  We have been…"
7th day (Sat)
Sonja Darai replied to Chris Marcus's discussion 'Quakers featured in novels'
"I read a few years ago Quaker Summer by Lisa Samson.  It's in some series called Women of…"
7th day (Sat)
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

HHS Announces New Conscience and Religious Freedom Division

Today, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is pleased to announce the formation…See More
6th day (Fri)
Claire Wynn replied to Chris Marcus's discussion 'Quakers featured in novels'
"There is a historical novel called Flowers From The Storm by Laura Kinsale in which the heroine is…"
6th day (Fri)
Kirby Urner posted a discussion

Love Thyself as Thine Enemy

Switched around this way, this Christian enjoinder makes plenty of sense.A true enemy deserves…See More
5th day (Thu)
Kirby Urner commented on Chaplain Stogumber's blog post 'Rambling: Quaker or Anabaptist? A matter of class?'
"I enjoy the perspective of Quakerism as business friendly, as clearly, based on its jargon,…"
1st month 16
Anne Hutchinson posted a blog post

A Post from Madison Monthly Meeting News, with an excerpt from my post regarding FWCC Traveling Ministry Corps

Your Heart Knows What to Do We have a traveling minister in our midst. Chuck Schobert, a member of…See More
1st month 14
Keith Saylor commented on Chaplain Stogumber's blog post 'Rambling: Quaker or Anabaptist? A matter of class?'
"Eratta - Ana spurs = Anabaptists Both instead of but in the next Sentence."
1st month 13

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service