If a Meeting takes a stand on any significant issue whatsoever it excludes (and temporarily alienates) people who see the matter otherwise.

If a Meeting can not take a stand on matters causing great suffering (and there is always disagreement about these, or someone would have simply corrected them) we seem to fall short of a basic Christian duty.

A possible resolution to this might look like what we did (as I heard it) with the Quaker House in Ulster. Of two warring groups, both considered the Quakers to be neutral and disinterested. As the leaders of these groups grew old, and tired beyond tired of losing people they loved, they started slipping in the back door of the Quaker House. Remarkably, there'd be someone there from the other side who'd just snuck in. It was the one place they could talk.

They were not, of course, just sitting there being silent at each other...

I think we've become far too much afraid of offending each other. (If you can't offend your Friends, you'll have to offend someone else? That doesn't sound right either.)

"We agree to disagree (so just shut up, allright!!!)"? We may be better off with ongoing bickering, yes? At least then we wouldn't have to feel that something we hold dear is socially unacceptable. (Maybe it is? Yeah, we're weird creatures, aren't we?)

Bearing with each other is an essential piece of this. A sufficient piece?

I fear it leaves out one difficult, outright painful duty -- We have to seriously wonder, each time, whether there's something about the issue our silly opponent has somehow gotten right, while we've utterly missed it....

Ridiculous, wasn't it? Okay, we're all done now, aren't we? Uh, aren't we? oh oh...
 

Views: 97

Comment by Kirby Urner on 4th mo. 6, 2017 at 2:29pm

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile
6 hours ago
Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile photo
6 hours ago
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Here's a Youtube to get the ball rolling: https://youtu.be/4VJirp2TRZY I see parallels with…"
7 hours ago
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Few contemporaries simultaneously have the reputation for being great and wise religious leaders,…"
8 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I have no reason to doubt that. Some Quakers are really into theology, and once that' s your…"
8 hours ago
Forrest Curo commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"What does God [feel free to interpret this in whatever way you so-far envision the Life and Soul in…"
11 hours ago
David McKay commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"Not with-it enough to speak to "we just don't care if you think in terms of a Trinity or…"
12 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I go back to Karen Armstrong's observation that Protestantism stands out in its focus on…"
16 hours ago

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service