If a Meeting takes a stand on any significant issue whatsoever it excludes (and temporarily alienates) people who see the matter otherwise.

If a Meeting can not take a stand on matters causing great suffering (and there is always disagreement about these, or someone would have simply corrected them) we seem to fall short of a basic Christian duty.

A possible resolution to this might look like what we did (as I heard it) with the Quaker House in Ulster. Of two warring groups, both considered the Quakers to be neutral and disinterested. As the leaders of these groups grew old, and tired beyond tired of losing people they loved, they started slipping in the back door of the Quaker House. Remarkably, there'd be someone there from the other side who'd just snuck in. It was the one place they could talk.

They were not, of course, just sitting there being silent at each other...

I think we've become far too much afraid of offending each other. (If you can't offend your Friends, you'll have to offend someone else? That doesn't sound right either.)

"We agree to disagree (so just shut up, allright!!!)"? We may be better off with ongoing bickering, yes? At least then we wouldn't have to feel that something we hold dear is socially unacceptable. (Maybe it is? Yeah, we're weird creatures, aren't we?)

Bearing with each other is an essential piece of this. A sufficient piece?

I fear it leaves out one difficult, outright painful duty -- We have to seriously wonder, each time, whether there's something about the issue our silly opponent has somehow gotten right, while we've utterly missed it....

Ridiculous, wasn't it? Okay, we're all done now, aren't we? Uh, aren't we? oh oh...

Views: 101

Comment by Kirby Urner on 4th mo. 6, 2017 at 2:29pm


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Keith Saylor commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Hidden things brought to light, or, the discord of the grand Quakers among themselves ...'
"Research Notes: John Perrot, George Fox In 1664 John Perrott, writing from Jamaica, sent this a…"
Melinda Grube liked Kirby Urner's discussion No Quakers, Only Quakerism
4th day (Wed)
Melinda Grube updated their profile
4th day (Wed)
Michael liked Kirby Urner's discussion No Quakers, Only Quakerism
3rd day (Tue)
George-Michael Payne updated their profile
2nd day (Mon)
Madeleine Reidy replied to Barbara Smith's discussion 'New Worship Group near Ithaca, NY' in the group Conservative Friends
"Hello Barb, I'm originally from Trumansburg, now live in New Orleans, but I occasionally go…"
3rd month 17
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

Hidden things brought to light, or, the discord of the grand Quakers among themselves ...

Research Notes, Geroge Fox, John Pennymen, John Perrot, Robert RichI am currently keyboarding…See More
3rd month 16
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'No Quakers, Only Quakerism'
"Deborah writes, in conclusion: At the core of the practice of Quakerism is the experience, and the…"
3rd month 15

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service