The Bible Says Death to Sinners: What Canst Thou Say?

Where are Quakers with the death penalty? 

 The death penalty is a good question to consider the week after we mark Jesus’s crucifixion and resurrection.  Do we believe any human being should ever be executed, whatever the means: cross and nails, electric shock, guillotine, poison gas, or stoning?

 The Old Testament prescribes the death penalty for a wide variety of misdeeds: murder, kidnap, rape, adultery, even false prophecy (Deuteronomy 13:5). 

 How about homosexual acts?  Yes, Leviticus 20:13 prescribes “if a man lies with a male as he lies with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination. They shall surely be put to death.” But Leviticus 20:9 prescribes “‘anyone who curses their father or mother is to be put to death. Because they have cursed their father or mother, their blood will be on their own head.”  If you take the one Leviticus text as the inerrant, unchanging instruction of God, don’t you have to take the other?

 Jesus never urges that anyone be put to death, and sidesteps the question with the adulteress in John 8 (“let he who is without sin cast the first stone”).  But in Romans 13:1-7, Paul appears to sweepingly underwrite all the customary actions of governments, including, presumably, the death penalty.  “The powers that be are ordained by God.”

 Certainly there is no straightforward Biblical edict against the death penalty.  Does that mean we should allow for its use even if only in rare circumstances?

 For some evangelicals, the death penalty must be supported because the Bible supports it.  Says Gotquestions,org, for example, “we must remember that God has instituted capital punishment in His Word; therefore, it would be presumptuous of us to think that we could institute a higher standard. God has the highest standard of any being; He is perfect. This standard applies not only to us but to Himself. Therefore, He loves to an infinite degree, and He has mercy to an infinite degree. We also see that He has wrath to an infinite degree, and it is all maintained in a perfect balance. “  And “Christians should not fight against the government’s right to execute the perpetrators of the most evil of crimes.”

 Acting on behalf of U.S. Quakers, the Friends Committee for National Legislation has been working for the abolition of the death penalty for many years. Said its statement of Legislative Policy in 1994:

 “We seek the abolition of the death penalty because it denies the sacredness of human life and violates our belief in the human capacity for change. This irreversible penalty cannot be applied equitably and without error. Use of the death penalty by the state powerfully reinforces the idea that killing can be a proper way of responding to those who have wronged us. We do not believe that reinforcement of that idea can lead to healthier and safer communities.”

The question of the death penalty is back in the news because Connecticut, this week, will become the seventeenth state (and the fifth in five years) to abolish the death penalty. 

 I am an opponent of the death penalty, and for reasons that follow from my being a follower of Jesus.  I believe He came to teach us that “loving thy neighbor as thyself” calls for us to extend mercy to those who commit bad deeds, even very bad ones, and to believe that redemption is possible for everyone, even those who commit very bad deeds. 

 I draw that understanding from Scripture and from prayer, but I acknowledge that I cannot point to a single Bible text (a snippet) to support this conclusion.  Rather, I am carried along by a strong current I find in Jesus’s teaching as recorded in Scripture, a current that is reinforced in my efforts to hear God’s will in prayer and worship. 

 Indiana Yearly Meeting’s Faith and Practice says (in the section on Essential Truths) “The Holy Scriptures were given by inspiration of God and are the divinely authorized record of the doctrines which Christians are bound to accept, and of the moral principles which are to regulate their lives and actions. In them, as interpreted and unfolded by the Holy Spirit, is an ever fresh and unfailing source of spiritual truth for the proper guidance of life and practice.”

 So on the question of the death penalty, how are we to read the guidance of Scripture as interpreted and unfolded by the Hoy Spirit? Is it the clarity of Leviticus to which we adhere, or the mercy that Jesus teaches in proclaiming a New Covenant (Luke 22:20)? 

Views: 100

Comment by Forrest Curo on 4th mo. 13, 2012 at 11:05am

The Bible shows Jesus being consistently resistant to people's efforts to apply the state religion of Judaism as if everything in there were God's directly-expressed will.

Since then we've had people, in Jesus' name, trying to apply the church regulations of Paul as if everything in them were God's directly-expressed will. Even though these are explicitly letters by a human being who knows that Jesus is God's designated ruler of Israel and the world-- but is working out the applications as he goes. That passage in Romans is notorious for its influence on German pastors in the Nazi era-- and should probably have just been paraphrased as: "Don't get into trouble with the authorities if you can help it; God is using them to help keep as good an order as people can accept, for now."

The clarity that Jesus offers: ~If you yourself are guiltless, then you may justly judge and harm people for their misdeeds.

If anyone wants to ask Jesus, rather than Paul, that is.


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"The paper I just posted revises one I wrote 20 years ago.  I would like to add one more…"
11 hours ago
William F Rushby posted a discussion

Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends

I have been involved with Conservative Friends, sometimes more and sometimes less, for 50 years. …See More
18 hours ago
Marcia P Roberts commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"William, Keith: Thank you for your words, which strengthen me and comfort me in this struggle. In…"
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"Marcia, I share your struggle with the power of the reflective process in matters of human…"
7th month 28
William F Rushby commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"Marcia: Sorry I didn't proofread my spelling of your name!"
7th month 27
William F Rushby commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"Marica: Don't take it personally!  The mind plays tricks on all of us.  I have yet…"
7th month 27
Marcia P Roberts commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"Your comments, Keith, and the follow-up comment of William, both touched a chord. You describe my…"
7th month 27
William F Rushby commented on Marcia P Roberts's blog post 'No respector of persons'
"Keith Saylor wrote: "Marcia, I have read this piece a number of times. A concern keeps…"
7th month 27

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service