April 23, 2013

This is the first in what I am imagining as a series of posts about the Bible in which I want to say how and why I find the Bible essential for my spiritual life. I hope these musings may be useful to others. I know the Bible has come more to divide Friends than hold us together, but I believe it could be useful in our finding greater unity among Fri.... The reflections in these posts about the Bible draw on material I presented at the Midyear gathering of Iowa Yearly Meeting Conservative, and on reflections that Friends at that gathering shared with me, as they welcomed me into their midst.

My First Bible 1955.pngI received my first Bible in 1955, when I was about to turn nine, as a gift from the Brighton Presbyterian Church, the church to which my family belonged in the suburbs of Rochester, New York. I’d read the Bible before this day, but this was the first Bible that was my own. I still have it. (It is a Revised Standard Version, now somewhat broken in the spine.)

I remember there was some ceremony attached to the presentation. A group of us, all about the same age, received our Bibles together, from the church’s Himandher Club. That was a fellowship organization within the church for young married couples (him and her, get it?).  The signatures are those of the Senior Minister, George Ulp, and the Associate (or Family) Minister, Carl Simon. Along with my parents, those two were as responsible as anyone for my religious education as a boy.

What I don’t remember is anyone saying anything about the Book I was receiving. No one told me who wrote it. No one said why it was worth my attention. No one told me how to read it. It just was: here, take this as a gift, you’ll want it and need it.

They were right. Today, I do want it and need it. Nevertheless, I wish they had said more about why it was something of value. For a few years, it was a book I took care with because it was a gift. Then, in my teens, it became a gift I treated like something from a distant and elderly aunt or uncle. I knew the givers meant well, but this wasn’t really for me. How could it be, they didn’t really know me.  Even when it followed me to college, it mostly stayed on the shelf.

Years later, I have come to know it better. From time to time I would pick it up and read parts of it for one reason or another. Later, I began reading it more regularly. I’m not sure I can say why, but I found things in it that deepened my spiritual life — along with things that left me cold. Still later, I began reading scholarship and commentaries about the Bible, and that drew me further in.

Today I have come to view the Bible as a gift. I am grateful to the Himandher Club and to George Ulp and Carl Simon for the gift of my first Bible. The gift isn’t really from them, however.

I have come to view the Bible as a gift to each and all of us from the earliest Christian communities. I imagine their worship life together was largely face to face, largely oral. As communities of Christians took shape in places separated by distance, they began to communicate by letter. Someone might write down a sermon so it could be passed along. As the years passed, someone might write down as much of what he (could it have been she?) had heard about Jesus’s life, ministry, crucifixion and resurrection because there was no longer anyone alive who had first-hand recollection of those events. Eventually, we don’t quite know how, some of these materials were gathered up into collections, and still later, an agreement was reached on what was ‘the good stuff’ — which was the best collection.  That is the Bible we have today.

The Bible is a gift, a gift from very early Christians to those who live on this earth after them. Knowing it is a gift only tells us a little about the Bible, but it does tell us that someone cared enough to see we had it.  Like all gifts, we have to decide what to do with it: shelve it? read it? regift it? discard it? recommend it?

Also posted on River View Friend.

Views: 118

Comment by Clem Gerdelmann on 4th mo. 24, 2013 at 5:57am

Maybe all true gifts come without description/instructions, so we can find our(selves and way) in them. The more we attend to them, the more we attend to ourselves; the more we care for them, the more we care for ourselves; the more we offer ourselves to them, the more we offer to ourselves. Just like our Religious Society - when we decide what to do with it!!!!

Comment by Stephanie Stuckwisch on 4th mo. 27, 2013 at 11:54pm

I'm looking forward to your next posts.


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Christ's living appearance within me has drawn me out of the reflective nature and the process…"
6th day (Fri)
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"God is also more than anyone's experience of God. It's not that we can contain God in a…"
6th day (Fri)
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Hello Thomas, Through the immanent appearance of eternal life itself inshining upon me, I am drawn…"
6th day (Fri)
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
2nd month 23
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
2nd month 23
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd month 22
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd month 22
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"It's probably best to talk about many Biblical concepts of God. What they have in common is…"
2nd month 20

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service