Dear Friends,

 

I was sent this document on Google Docs.   It is a very critical, almost anti-Quaker, commentary on Philadelphia Friends' involvement with Occupy Wall Street.  I was sent it anonymously, without the ability to comment on it, the ability even to share it, or with an accompanying note explaining why someone wanted to send it to me.  Given these circumstances, I am quite suspicious of the motivation of whoever sent it to me. 

Despite these concerns, I think it raises some interesting points that I would like to see us discuss.  I saved my own copy so that I could link it above.  It is entirely public and anyone may comment (either there or here) but not edit, so as to preserve the original sentiment.

 

Cross-posted to my personal blog here.

Views: 294

Comment by Michael on 11th mo. 21, 2011 at 4:24am

I'm not sure what this adds, but my very strong suspicion is that the writer is one of the members that was "lost" by the Quakers.   The writer shows way more than above-average knowledge of Quakers (and, frankly, some of our problems, even if put harsher than I think is fair).  In addition, while the criticism the writer launches against Quaker involvement seems applicable to all religious groups at OWS, it is singularly aimed at Quakers.

Reading this, in light of what I suspect it to be, I feel sad for this person.  I wish the person would feel comfortable speaking openly about her/his experience and issues with Quakers, so that some dialogue could be had and perhaps some resolution could be reached.

Comment by Mackenzie on 12th mo. 5, 2011 at 12:17pm

I saw the document when it was first linked on Twitter and wrote this response:

http://maco.dreamwidth.org/25066.html

Comment by Forrest Curo on 12th mo. 5, 2011 at 12:45pm

I am a fervent supporter of the occupy movement, and I find much of the criticism here valid, even though misstated to some extent.

I, for example, believe that the occupy movement needs to become a movement explicitly rooted in its religious roots. Quakers should be a natural institutional source of people with that kind of grounding... and should be raising that concern within the occupy movement, as natural supporters of their political concerns.

If that concern is widely enough shared by others in the occupy movement, it may at least come to be expressed as a concern of that movement. The 'animal-rights' folks have certainly gotten their position into my local position-statement [to our detriment, I would say] but they are part of the movement, wanted their concerns included, got it.

If enough people come to realize that spiritual concerns are and must be central to the movement, we could (in fact) be considered to have 'co-opted' the movement for (what should be) the goals of our "failed" religious institution.

I agree that our institution has, in fact, failed.

The resurrection of our institution may well require us to recognize that we have failed, repeatedly and chronically... and will continue to do so, until we (personally and collectively) can approach every religious/political/personal issue in a spirit of worship.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Keith Saylor commented on Ellis Hein's blog post 'True Christians: How Do You Know Them?'
"Howard, Thank you for your spiritual quickening and fellowship. The discussion on this thread has…"
21 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'The Line You Shall Not Cross'
"The outward weapons of this protectorate are religious and political ideology, theology, tradition,…"
yesterday
Sarah Way posted a blog post

Job Available: Young Adult Field Secretary, New York Yearly Meeting

The Young Adult Field Secretary works with and supports the young adults in New York Yearly…See More
yesterday
Randal Ott Espinoza liked Mackenzie's blog post Elias Hicks, reason/rationalism, and some atonement theory
4th day (Wed)
Howard Brod commented on Ellis Hein's blog post 'True Christians: How Do You Know Them?'
"Keith, I don't know what to tell you; but that your words that express the full completeness…"
3rd day (Tue)
Forrest Curo commented on Ellis Hein's blog post 'True Christians: How Do You Know Them?'
"Well, for sure I'm the sort of 'class-clown' spirit that seemed to push George…"
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor commented on Ellis Hein's blog post 'True Christians: How Do You Know Them?'
"Hey Forrest. God has told me to tell you that you are of a dark, decieved, and proud, spirit. If…"
3rd day (Tue)
Forrest Curo commented on Ellis Hein's blog post 'True Christians: How Do You Know Them?'
"Um, you can know Christians by how they all love each other, right? I read that somewhere..."
3rd day (Tue)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service