QuakerQuaker

Primitive Christianity Revived, Again

1 Corinthians 6:9 is a hot topic these days. It seems that it is time for me to share some of the results of my prayers about it, since like it or not, the debates and arguments and rhetoric have begun to frequently touch my daily life, and it seems to be time to open up a bit about what I have been receiving in prayer.


And the spoiler alert is that I don’t have an easy or even a difficult resolution for anyone. All I can offer is a little light, from what has been given to me so far.


We do better, I believe, when we take scripture seriously. That includes reading it in the Spirit in which it was given, testing scripture against scripture, and waiting upon the Lord for guidance. It includes, in my approach, resisting the urge (and I get it) to use scripture to prove one’s point or tear down another person. It includes a willingness to consider the writer, the target audience of the writing, and their purpose – to some extent. My caution about the heady, intellectual approach is that in my experience, this leads to argument and perhaps self-satisfaction but not resolution or redemption.


Disclaimer – I cannot pretend to be the “chief of sinners,” but have had a good run at it from time to time in my life. Those who know me best know my frailties, and I bless them for their love and guidance. So, along the lines of the Lord using the foolish to confound the wise, I offer to share some openings I have had in prayer, about how Friends are to deal with sin. Aside from the mention of 1 Corinthians 6:9, which is central to many arguments, I am going to refer to simply to sin, because it seems to me that overall what is the appropriate way to deal with one is the appropriate way to deal with all.


Aside from the above-mentioned scripture passage, another one often brought up is Jesus and the woman caught in adultery. What did Jesus do? He listened to the accusers, let them have their say. What He did not do was engage them in an argument about scripture, about what God really meant, and so forth. Jesus made the point that the one who is to punish sins is the one without sin. He wrote something in the sand, and one by one, the accusers left. It appears that each decided he was not without sin. I did not read that any of them repented, just that, when faced with whatever it was that Jesus knew and was writing in the sand, they were, so to speak, out of ammunition. And once they were out of ammunition, it looks like they no longer had a purpose, at least, no purpose to be with Jesus.


The woman, who had been facing death just minutes earlier, stayed. She stayed long enough to hear what Jesus said, asking where her accusers were and directing her to go and sin no more. She responded to Him when He spoke to her. We are not given the rest of the story, whether she followed His directions or not.


As this scripture came to me in prayer, a question came with it. Who did right in this story? Jesus did, in my opinion. He stood for mercy, and he stood against sin. Not just the sin of the woman brought before Him, but against the sin(s) of her accusers.


The woman did right by staying with Jesus and responding to him.


There was even something right about what the accusers did, although the set up was designed to destroy Jesus’ credibility and ministry. But they did right by bringing the woman to Jesus.


They did right by acknowledging that they themselves were not without sin.


Did they do right by walking away? I am not inclined to believe so.


But beyond these openings about the story, I did not receive much. What I did receive was another scripture story, this one from the Old Testament prophet Hosea. He married a prostitute because the Lord told Him to do so.


This introduces a level of complexity to the subject of sin, at least, in my mind. In 1 Corinthians 6, Paul writes quite specifically about the spiritual damage done by having sex with a prostitute. But the story of Hosea tells us that it was the Lord’s will for Hosea to marry Gomer, the prostitute. Well, what am I to do with that information?


Checking to see if I recall that story correctly, I found the following statements (especially the text I have underlined) that jumped out at me, on http://bible.org/seriespage/hosea in an article written by Hampton Keathley IV: “I also think Hosea’s marriage is a picture of God’s relationship with Israel. Hosea’s choice of a prostitute was exactly like God’s choice of Abraham. Abraham was just another sinner like the rest of the people in the world. He did not deserve to be chosen. But that isn’t what the Jews thought. They thought Abraham was special because of his own merit and upright character. (cf. Jubilees 11:14f, 12:1f OT Pseudepigrapha vol 2, p. 79-80,Charlesworth) God may be using Hosea’s marriage to a prostitute to make this point. We will see later that the Israelites thought God owed them blessing. Why else would someone think that, unless they thought they were special through some merit of their own.”


In prayer times past, when I asked the Lord to just give me the answer to the hot topic, here is what I was told: most who are involved in the argument are not asking the right questions, and are not focusing on what matters most to the Lord. People are taking positions, taking stands, and tossing verbal stones at one another. And at least in some cases, it appears that they are not even expecting to win their case, they have become habituated to the conflict.


It took some time before my next question began to be answered. Lord, what are the right questions, what is the right focus? I am beginning to see that it has to do with bringing honor to the Lord Jesus, and thereby, to God the Father.


Views: 2

Tags: Hosea, answer to prayer, conflict, judgment, relationships, righteousness, scripture, sin

Comment by Faye M. Chapman on 2nd mo. 24, 2010 at 5:49am
Raye, Thanks for thy willingness to share this. Much time has been spent on biblical warfare. Thy post seems to reach out to us to consider letting Christ do the judging. We all fall down when His compassion is standing up before our ability to do His job for Him. We have, as humans, only one ability and that is to choose to let Him work through us or not. We seem like reluctant Jonahs when it comes to saying YES to Him. Whether it makes us happy or not that Christ lives and thrives in us sinners makes no never mind. I think the least we can do is accept the fact that He works in unwed mothers and fathers, harlots, divorcees and all manner what seems to be low life to us and the reason is because we are all god-like or demon-like depending on our choices. It doesn't seem to scare Him at all. I pray thy discussion will thrive in love among us.
Comment by Stephen Mitsuo on 2nd mo. 25, 2010 at 1:10pm
The last opening that you have shared--that we must bring honor to the Lord--has caused me to re-evaluate my understanding of sin. I had come to think of it as something that drew me away from God (whatever that thing might be). Now I see that that was sort of a self-centered definition. You have led me to include under "sin" whatever I do that does not reflect well on the one I profess as Lord. In other words, anything I do that does not adhere to that wonderful 70s song, "They Will Know We are Christians by Our Love" ("by this will everyone know you are my disciples...").
Comment by Shawna Roberts on 3rd mo. 8, 2010 at 2:14pm
Thank you for your excellent thoughts, Raye.

I wonder what Christ would want us to do if we saw folks we loved heaving stones at someone else? What would bring honor to Christ? Standing by and watching silently? Or stepping in front of the person they were heaving stones at, and asking the folks who were doing the heaving to consider whether their actions are bringing honor to God?

I have watched silently, and real people with real hearts have been bruised and battered by those I love. It was the wrong choice.
Comment by Diane McHale on 3rd mo. 10, 2010 at 7:31pm
I like your thoughtful approach.
I haven't prayed over it, but it occurs to me that as far as Hosea goes, there is a big difference between being a customer of a prostitute and marrying one. Buying a woman is using another human being. I believe it is disrespectful of her soul. I think it would be bad for you spiritually as well to use someone. Marrying a woman who has been a prostitute, however, could be an act of love. That's my interpretation.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Quakers

About QuakerQuaker

QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.

Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List

Support:

Make a One-Time Online Donation (Paypal)

Make a $10 Monthly Recurring Donation

Advertise

Latest Activity

David Nelson Seaman replied to Missy's discussion 'Where's the Quaker in Quaker?'
"George Fox made a statement while inprisoned in Lancunstone jail that can perhaps be a…"
59 minutes ago
Profile IconQuakerQuaker.org

A Passionate and Determined Quest for Adequacy: Deep Worship

Many Friends say that they want deep worship, but we are not always good at saying what that means.… See More
1 hour ago
Julie DeMarchi Heiland commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'The Never-Changing Case for Marriage'
"Just a note regarding God marrying. I've often heard Quakers talk about the uniqueness of this…"
3 hours ago
Profile IconQuakerQuaker.org

$The Never-Changing Case for Marriage - QuakerQuaker

Marriage roles have changed, and yet marriage’s essential core has not. That’s why Trueblood… See More
7 hours ago
Profile IconQuakerQuaker.org

Young Quaker leadership programme launched inn UK

Quaker Study Centre has launched its augural young adult leadership programme, beginning this… See More
7 hours ago
Profile IconQuakerQuaker.org

Steven Davison: Obstacles to Quaker Earthcare « Through the Flaming Sword

Quakerism has spiritualized religion even further, doing away with all the religious practices that… See More
7 hours ago
Profile IconQuakerQuaker.org

Gil George: One Quaker'€™s Perspective on Modernism vs. Fundamentalism

I have to admit that hearing Friends discuss fundamentalism vs. modernism makes me a bit uneasy.… See More
7 hours ago
Forrest Curo commented on Jim Wilson's blog post 'Robert Barclay and Quaker Quietism'
"The original "Quietists" were Catholics, forming a movement their contemporary Church…"
7 hours ago
Jim Wilson commented on Jim Wilson's blog post 'Robert Barclay and Quaker Quietism'
"Friend Doug:  That's a good suggestion.  It would serve well by shifting the…"
11 hours ago
Stephanie Stuckwisch commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'The Never-Changing Case for Marriage'
"Whenever the issue of same sex marriage arises in Quaker circles, two comments come to mind: 1.…"
13 hours ago
Stephanie Stuckwisch commented on Christine Betz Hall's blog post 'Summer Outreach in Pacific Northwest—Way of the Spirit'
"I am one of the participants in the Way of the Spirit. Chris has put together a great program. The…"
13 hours ago
Stephanie Stuckwisch commented on Jim Wilson's blog post 'Robert Barclay and Quaker Quietism'
"Thank you for sharing that passage from Barclay. Quietism gets a bad rap in this day and age. …"
13 hours ago

© 2012   Created by QuakerQuaker.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service