[memo to a listserv for faculty and Peace Corps vets, a couple typos fixed, I think I'll add this to Medium]

I was pleased to see the militaries colluding to put on a fun show for the vicious masses, eager for fireworks. TV voyeurs love a great spectacle. Many are whining they want more. They want to "rubbleize" Damascus. "Please please please give us more violence".


Choosing to attack supposed "chemical weapons facilities" was on paper reckless (if any toxic gases were really present), but clips show people milling about taking pictures, so it was more a case of destroying evidence of research programs, if there was any, not actual stockpiles. We'll never know at this point. How convenient.

Like Donald said, the missiles would be "smart" (with heavy quotes). And yes, Assad is "an animal", and so are we all, literally (no offense to non-humans, our moral betters to be sure).

No major media bring up the fine points of any War Powers act, as this exercise, like last year's (same time, same script) is all about getting the home folks used to Congress having no say, no responsibility, ala the military dictatorship model (president says go, military goes, no Congress required, just count on media to whip up some cheerleaders, any questioners are disloyal Russian trolls). 

Reality TV screenwriters know how to take it from script to reality directly, no need to involve cumbersome legislation. Lawmakers are boring. War is exciting. TV opinion shapers are eager for more war. They don't want any brakes to catharsis. Give the people their circus!

I'm used to living under martial law in the Philippines. This feels about the same. Very Banana Republic. Not a democracy, that's obvious, but in my experience Americans don't really care for democracy. They hunger to be militarized and show obedience.

Views: 62

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Howard Brod added a discussion to the group Liberal Quakers
Thumbnail

The Earliest Quakers and liberal Quakerism

Many Quakers mistakenly assume that the modern liberal Quaker movement is not akin to the movement…See More
yesterday
Kim Salsman liked Howard Brod's blog post The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism
1st day (Sun)
Howard Brod commented on Howard Brod's blog post 'The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism'
"So well said, David.  Thank you!"
7th day (Sat)
David McKay commented on Howard Brod's blog post 'The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism'
"Thank you for the clarification. I do follow the contemplatives as much as I can (I lack their…"
7th day (Sat)
Howard Brod commented on Howard Brod's blog post 'The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism'
"Thanks David, For the very reasons you state, Mysticism has many variant descriptions…"
7th day (Sat)
David McKay commented on Howard Brod's blog post 'The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism'
"I usually grimace when a response to somebody's offering is to quibble about words. I'm…"
7th day (Sat)
Howard Brod posted a blog post

The Earliest Quakers and Liberal Quakerism

Many Quakers mistakenly assume that the modern liberal Quaker movement is not akin to the movement…See More
7th day (Sat)
Howard Brod commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Those Early Quakers who were come out of the process of participation in and identification with outward Ecclesiastical and Magisterial Forms, Practices, and Prescriptions.'
"Thanks Keith.  I believe you answered most of my questions, pointing me to suspect that there…"
6th day (Fri)

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service