One hundred years ago next week was born Bayard Rustin, the man who was the principal logistical organizer of the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom. That march took place on August 28, 1963 and was attended by upwards of a quarter of a million people. Bayard Rustin was a Quaker and a gay man.

A. Philip Randolph, the president of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters, was the civil rights leader who initiated and built the leadership coalition for the March. Other leaders included James Farmer (CORE), John Lewis (SNCC), Roy Wilkens (NAACP), Whitney Young (Urban League), and Martin Luther King, Jr., who (of course) gave the most memorable speech at the gathering.

The detailed organizational and logistical work, however, was accomplished by Rustin, who was a long-time associate of Randolph’s and King’s. As the Wikipedia entry on the March says, “Rustin built and led the team of activists and organizers who publicized the march and recruited the marchers, coordinated the buses and trains, provided the marshals, and set up and administered all of the logistic details of a mass march in the nation's capital.”

Many, including some civil rights leaders, expected the March to fail. Without Rustin, it certainly would have failed. Because it succeeded, the nation was on its way to passing the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Rustin had also organized the 1947 Journey of Reconciliation, the first of the Freedom Rides to test the Supreme Court ruling that banned racial discrimination in interstate travel.

During his adult life, Rustin lived in New York City and belonged to 15th Street Meeting, New York Yearly Meeting. Before and after World War II, he worked for A.J. Muste at the Fellowship of Reconciliation as a field organizer. During the war he spent three years in jail as a pacifist, having refused designation as a conscientious objector because that designation was not available to others. Later he worked for the War Resisters League. He was a principal adviser to Martin Luther King, Jr. during the Montgomery Bus Boycott and shared in the work of building the Southern Christian Leadership Conference.

During the 1950s, Rustin was a key member of a study group at the AFSC that wrote Speak Truth to Power, an important statement of the Quaker commitment to non-violence. At his request, however, his name was omitted from the list of authors when it was published.

Why? Because he was a homosexual. Not one to hide his sexual orientation, he was arrested on January 21, 1953 for lewd vagrancy in Pasadena, California. Prior to 1962, commission of a homosexual act was against the law in every state of the United States. It was not until 2003 that the U.S. Supreme Court declared unconstitutional (in Lawrence v. Texas) state laws criminalizing private, non-commercial sexual activity between consenting adults.

In September 2010, the Board of Directors of the American Friends Service Committee approved a minute restoring the name of Bayard Rustin as one of the principal authors of Speak Truth to Power. The version of this work now available on the AFSC website now includes his name among the authors.

In his 1948 William Penn Lecture, Bayard Rustin asked, “How can we love God, whom we have not seen, if we cannot, in time of crisis, find the way to love our brothers whom we have seen?" There is a terrific documentary available on Rustin called Brother Outsider. A high school is now named for him in West Chester (PA), where he grew up.

Are we Quakers prepared to fully embrace, even honor, Bayard Rustin as one of us, as someone who loved others and worked tirelessly for peace and justice? Or do we want to say (as, for example, Indiana Yearly Meeting’s 1982 Minute on Homosexuality now says), that he was a sinner whose service and leadership we would not welcome?

Views: 280

Tags: Bayard, Rustin, civil, homosexuality, rights

Comment by Martin Kelley on 3rd mo. 9, 2012 at 5:28pm
There's a nice remembrance of Rustin in the March issue of Friends Journal, timed to coincide with the hundredth anniversary of his birth. Since the issue's theme happens to be "Crime and Punishment," we dig up a copy of his mugshot from his arrest (yes, we're starting down that slippery slope toward beginning the Quaker TMZ!). Rustin is one of the greats who have been wrongly pushed aside in the histories. I'm glad to hear that AFSC has done its part to write him back in.
Comment by Forrest Curo on 3rd mo. 10, 2012 at 11:46am

The problem comes, not with his sexuality, but with his 'pragmatic' support of the US war against Vietnam. King saw that any such political maneuvering worked to destroy the movement's integrity; there is evidence that this was the stand that led directly to the government-supported assassination of King.

By human-being standards, I have to see Rustin as a good man who made a bad mistake. In this he is not so unusual...

Comment by funnel101 on 3rd mo. 10, 2012 at 1:57pm

I think we're prepared to embrace and honor Rustin as one of us. I've been really encouraged by the number of articles and interest in Rustin I've seen recently.

Comment by Rich Accetta-Evans on 3rd mo. 10, 2012 at 9:46pm

He was a great man.  His presence honored us more than we can honor him.

 

Comment by Mackenzie on 3rd mo. 12, 2012 at 2:29pm

The impression I had was that he didn't support the fighting in Viet Nam, just didn't think it was his fight to take on. He fought against WW2 when he was younger, and now it was another generation's turn, while he dealt with issues closer to home.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 3rd mo. 12, 2012 at 6:19pm

Person's gotta do what a person's gotta do. People told King not to take on the War; he couldn't duck it.

I don't see much point in playing good-man/bad-man, with anybody. This just disappointed me; was a sad reminder that anybody can find himself on a high mountain being offered 'the kingdoms of the world, which are mine to give...' and anyone can make a bad choice for 'good' reasons.

Comment by Doug Bennett on 3rd mo. 12, 2012 at 7:40pm

Rustin was an early, articulate opponent of the war, as this 1965 (!) article from The New York Review of Books shows (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1965/nov/25/the-vietnam-pr...).    There's no question about where he stood, and he was vocal about that.  He and King did disagree, tactically, about whether to join the civil rights and anti-war messages in actions.  They didn't disagree about what to think about these matters. 

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation or get us something from our Amazon wishlist.

Latest Activity

Clem Gerdelmann posted a blog post

Liberation Lobotomy

Here at "Spirit and Truth" hospital we treat, in silence, everything from chronic racism to acute…See More
12 minutes ago
Robben Wainer commented on Kevin Camp's blog post 'New Voices'
"In my years growing up at home my Mother belabored the sins of the family with the wish that she…"
5 hours ago
Robben Wainer replied to James C Schultz's discussion 'The PRESENCE'
"I feel the presence through the practice of mind,body and spirit. By eating a vegetarian diet, by…"
8 hours ago
James C Schultz replied to Clem Gerdelmann's discussion 'Fanaticism'
"thankfully Love doesn't need words.  Unfortunately that just proves how little love there…"
9 hours ago
Robben Wainer replied to Clem Gerdelmann's discussion 'Fanaticism'
"I feel the Quaker spirit is alive today, and agree that it is very real. Faith works has different…"
10 hours ago
Forrest Curo posted a blog post

Dogmarrel (written in Meeting today, sorry!)

God made music; God made thought; God made notions to think we ought.God made dogmas of having no…See More
13 hours ago
Forrest Curo replied to Clem Gerdelmann's discussion 'Fanaticism'
"James, thanks! I think my point is that there is a Real, that it has true power and uses that power…"
14 hours ago
Forrest Curo commented on Kevin Camp's blog post 'New Voices'
"It isn't a "right to speak in Meeting"; it's the Spirit's Meeting and the…"
14 hours ago

© 2014   Created by QuakerQuaker.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service