Jesus said that he calls us friends because he has made the Father known to us.  As we are guided by Christ in our conscience, we do so with the awareness that we are part of God’s plan to spread Love and woo people into knowing the truth that Love is the unified field. 

Separation is sin.  Sin is generated by any action that causes separation and disturbs the unified field of Love.

Views: 91

Comment by Forrest Curo on 12th mo. 23, 2015 at 12:43pm

Okay, I don't remember anything specific that said that; but it's consistent with a great many things I do remember him saying; and certainly that's been my experience. I don't look/listen/wait inside and find pictures of Jesus, but interactions with God -- while the nature of God as I've gradually become acquainted is entirely in tune with what I believe was Jesus' message.

And that is a loving nature, but one embodying other virtues as well. God, so far as I see what God accomplishes in the world, seems to be continually disrupting all the false unities people mistakenly put their faith in... and so I'd have to say that what we call 'separation' is very often the will of God.

But then many separations people make in their minds are probably unnecessary, even (as you say) 'sinful'.

What about Christians who seem to be meeting Jesus as a sort of guru... a projection of God, an image that they seemingly mistake for Himself? Is the separation that we, and people knowing God in that way, see between ourselves -- the reflection of a real disunity, the effect of different stages in the development of people's connection with God -- or just a case of different modes for knowing God?

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby posted a blog post

Friends in Belize

Oscar Mmbali's NewsletterFebruary 2021…See More
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Christ's living appearance within me has drawn me out of the reflective nature and the process…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"God is also more than anyone's experience of God. It's not that we can contain God in a…"
2nd month 26
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Hello Thomas, Through the immanent appearance of eternal life itself inshining upon me, I am drawn…"
2nd month 26
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
2nd month 23
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
2nd month 23
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd month 22
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd month 22

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service