I had a conversation the other day with a good friend of mine about Quakers. One of the problems he had that we discussed was the peace testimony and pacifism. I was quite understanding as I’ve had problems and confusion with the peace testimony at times myself, but the main confusion with my friend was the difference between pacifism and just being passive. Etymologically they have different roots, pacifism coming from the latin word pacificus literally meaning “peacemaking” whereas passive comes from the latin passivus meaning “submissive”.

For me, the Quaker idea of pacifism isn’t about being submissive at all, or simply not doing anything, or saying in the face of violence, “Oh well, I’m a pacifist which means that while all of you are out dying in the field I’m gonna sit at home and watch TV.” I’ve know pacifists like this, who shun violence more out of personal fears and terror than out of a sense of compassion for all people.

As a Quaker the peace testimony is a call to actively find an alternative to violence. It’s not about avoiding violence, but facing it when it comes and saying, “With love I will not fight fire with fire.” For me being a pacifist is much harder than fighting, because it means that I have to show compassion to everyone, even those who may be doing me harm or worse, harming those in my life who I love. Being a pacifist isn’t about saying, “War is a no-no!” but it’s about taking up the radical understanding that war cannot solve any of our problems so I am going to personally find an alternative to violence in my life and become one of those patterns that George Fox talked about, for the world around me.

After explaining most of this to my friend I think he had a better idea of who we are as Quakers, or at least I hope he did. We may be pacifists but we’re certainly not passive, our love is meant to be active in the world around us, and though we may stand as silent witnesses, to those who have been convinced, that silence is more powerful than any weapon ever made by the servants of violence.

Views: 192

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"Wow, Marcia!  Your email is packed with issues we could discuss.  I am still laboring…"
9th month 2
Marcia P Roberts replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"I am curious to know what rituals Conservative Friends hold dear, William, when you talk about…"
9th month 2
Scott MacLeod liked Laura Rediehs's profile
8th month 26
William F Rushby replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
8th month 23
Keith Saylor replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
""The evidence suggests that Friends need the counsel of one another to implement their…"
8th month 23
William F Rushby replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"Howard, I think you would be above such stuff!"
8th month 22
Howard Brod replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"Thanks William. I have heard of what you speak of.  It is sad. Thanks."
8th month 22
William F Rushby replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends'
"I know of a meeting in XXX where a minority was frozen out for singing hymns at the end of the…"
8th month 22

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service