A Review of Edwin L. Battistella's "Sorry About That: The Language of Public Apology"

 Originally published on the blog of Quaker Universalist Fellowship.
Reviewed by Larry D. Spears.

Sorry About That: The Language of Public Apology, by Edwin L. Battistella (Oxford University Press, 2014).

Edwin L. Battistella’s book Sorry About That is a compilation and analysis of stories of pubic apologies in the primarily U.S. experience. Leaders everywhere make apologies, yet apology-phobia is a global disability. From the perspective given voice in this book, United States leaders have a particular problem with apology.

Apology is complex in human relationships. Effective public apologies are even more complex. Public apologies differ with cultural context, just as personal apologies differ in language and timing.

As a current example, reparations for slavery is a recent advocacy cause in the news, one that is highly controversial and unresolved. From this book it seems clear that there can be no reparations without an accompanying apology, and there can be no sound apology without reparations. But the author’s guidance indicates that public leaders are ill-equipped for this important task.

Reparations need apology for focus, while understanding and apology need reparations commensurate with the significance identified in the apology. There are weak slavery reparations proposals floating about in public discussion, ones that call for studies and partial funding programs for governments and private institutions. Currently, there is no comprehensive document outlining an apology and reparations.

The approach to effective apology and reparations is a universal challenge not unique to the U.S. experience. Germany, South Africa, Cambodia, Israel, Turkey, Russia, Columbia, Canada, Venezuela, and China also face the challenge of building mechanisms for effective apology and reparations for the future of those countries and cultures.

The author of this book argues that a successful public apology has essential elements:

  1. Expression of embarrassment for bad behavior;
  2. Acknowledgement of the correct rule of conduct;
  3. Acknowledgement of the depth of injury caused by the bad behavior;
  4. Sympathy for the victims of the bad behavior;
  5. Disavowal of the bad behavior;
  6. Criticism of oneself associated with the bad behavior;
  7. Commitment to pursue correct behavior in the future;
  8. Restitution/Reparations/Reform/Redress/Restoration.

The book offers numerous examples of attempts at public apologies in U.S. history. Some were successful. Most were not. However, the mere collection of public apologies and their analysis in this book provide materials for building a universal norm and expectation for future pubic apologies.

For guidance in public apology, there is much to learn from the practice and experience of public apology in other cultures. A notable example is Japanese Emperor Akihito’s apology for World War II.1

The title Sorry About That may cause some potential readers to dismiss this book as superficial. However, the book actually is one of only a few to address public apology in the history of the U.S. in a systematic manner. It is organized around actual historical occasions for public apology, each followed with analysis.

Battistella’s book and its bibliography are important resources for the process of identifying the essential elements of slavery reconciliation and the current issue of reparations for human slavery. The book includes an index, a bibliography, and an analytical guide to apologies with four situations for analysis (Exxon, BP, John Kerry, and Robert Kennedy), and a helpful table of contents.

Quakers: There is no explicit reference to Quakers in this book. Curiously, there is no explicit reference to religion in general, despite the fact that religious traditions have experience, wisdom, and liturgies for the management of apologies, private and public.

Quakers appear to have little experience or tradition regarding apologies. There are no written resources analyzing Quaker apologies by Quaker leaders and institutions in the Quaker tradition. George Fox, Margaret Fell2 and William Penn3 are known for intemperate language, but not for apologies. They are not known for any leadership regarding apologies during the founding of the Quaker movement.

Examples of past bad behavior by Quakers that merited apology include James Naylor, Native Americans, slavery, the 2008 financial crisis, 19th century eldering, and schisms among Quakers.

This book can be an important resource for Quakers generally, and particularly as Quakers participate in identifying and crafting a public apology for any reparation movement relating to slavery.


  • Do Quakers have any particular experience to contribute toward the development of standards for public apologies for bad behavior?
  • To what sources do Quakers look to provide guidance for public apologies?

Notes & Image Source

1How gratitude can ease Japan-South Korea frictions,” Christian Science Monitor Weekly (April 30, 2019).

Image: “Japan’s emperor – unlike Prime Minister Abe – apologizes for WWII,” by Kiyoshi Takenaka and Linda Sieg, Christian Science Monitor 8/15/2015 (Photo credit: Tom Hanai/Reuters).

2 Margaret Fell: Women’s Speaking Justified and Other Pamphlets, ed. by Jane Donawerth and Rebecca M. Lush (ASMAR Publications, The Other Voice in Early Modern Europe: The Toronto Series, Vol. 65, 2019).

3 William Penn: A Life, by Andrew R. Murphy (Oxford University Press, 2019).

Views: 23


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Diane Kerchner liked QuakerQuaker's group Plainness & Simplicity
4th day (Wed)
Diane Kerchner liked William F Rushby's discussion Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends
4th day (Wed)
Rainer Möller posted a blog post

Quakers unto the Civil War

My personal impression is that Quakers, like all abolitionists, enthusiastically took part in the…See More
2nd day (Mon)
Rainer Möller replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Two Narratives in American Society'
"Following this review Macaes' seems to say that before our times, when "Liberalism"…"
2nd day (Mon)
William F Rushby replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I think there is a relatively small elite at the top of the power structure of unprogrammed…"
1st day (Sun)
Forrest Curo replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"The main Quaker hierarchy today are those who learn to manipulate "Quaker Process"."
1st day (Sun)
Keith Saylor commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'In the Life itself the need for prophets and prophecies is fulfilled.'
"Your testimony to the witness of immanent power and presence of the inshining Light and Life is a…"
1st day (Sun)
Karl Malchut liked QuakerQuaker's group Liberal Quakers
1st day (Sun)

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service