Since the RELIGIOUS (emphasis mine) Society of Friends now welcomes "non-thesist" members, will it also open up to military quakers, or hedonistic quakers or to any other group of people who want to join without changing anything about their lifestyle or beliefs? I'm  not trying to offend anyone, but I cant really understand the point of joining the RELIGIOUS Society of Friends, if you are irreligious. Surley joining the humanist society, or something similar would be more appropriate? Again....Im not trying to offend or attack anybody, I'm just deperatly trying to understand something that dosn't make sense to me. Surely a belief in God, as well as a belief  in peace, honesty, simplicity, and eqaulity should be nessessary to becoming a Quaker?

Views: 267

Comment by Nikolas Southwell on 5th mo. 10, 2012 at 1:41pm

Thank you Allistair and Jim for your thoughtful responses. Peace to you both.

Comment by Paula Deming on 5th mo. 10, 2012 at 2:41pm

Dear Jim,

I believe you picked up the wrong piece of my note when you say you disagree with me. I see now that what I wrote could be misconstrued. So allow me to make a correction. On 2nd mo. 21, 2011 at 2:01pm, Nikolas wrote:           

In my own experience i have experienced being told that religion was a "fantasy" by a "nontheist" in one meeting, in response to my ministry. I will not return to this meeting. As for being asked not to talk about Christ in a meeting as was Stephanies experience....well need i say anymore?

 

I did not mean that Nikolas's view was intolerant. He, and Stephanie, had encountered intolerant attitudes in their meetings. You and I are in complete agreement that "the nontheists are the intolerant ones," as you wrote above.

 

Yours in Faith, Paula

Comment by Jim Wilson on 5th mo. 10, 2012 at 3:34pm

Friend Paula:

Thanks for taking the time to clarify.  I misunderstood; easy to do in cyberspace, at least it's easy for me. 

Apologies,

Thy Friend Jim

Comment by Rudy Zalesak on 5th mo. 16, 2012 at 7:28pm

I'm not sure where you are posting from, Nikolas, but in the US there have been active military members in Friends' meetings for a long time. I have the impression that this is more likely in the meetings that are more "mainstream Protestant" in tone.  In any case there were certainly Friends who felt led to join the military during WWII, in all branches of Friends. 

Comment by Paula Deming on 5th mo. 16, 2012 at 8:07pm

Rudy, a Friend in our meeting labored long and hard with the idea of service in the military, feeling that he had to do something. After reading about the work of Quakers during the first and second World Wars, he enlisted as a noncom: Combat medic. He turned down an officership, in solidarity with the enlistees. He returned last July. He now speaks in classrooms about the imagery of war in our society, and how sanitized and glorified it is.

Comment by James C Schultz on 5th mo. 17, 2012 at 12:06pm

I suggest you read "Christianity after Religion" where the Author addresses your question in more detail than this space would permit.

 

Comment by William F Rushby on 5th mo. 17, 2012 at 3:24pm

Rudy Zalesak wrote: I have the impression that this (military service) is more likely in the meetings that are more "mainstream Protestant" in tone.

Actually, among unprogrammed Friends, the Hicksites were much more prone to serving in the military.  Swarthmore College even had its own ROTC unit!

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Tip Jar

It takes many hours a month to sift through hundreds of websites to come up with this daily curated list of the best of the Quaker web. If you learn more about Friends and find joy and spiritual growth in the conversations these links provide, please consider supporting the ministry with a monthly subscription.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

James Michael Tower commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'Biblical Inerrancy Watch: the Evangelical Free Church of America'
"Hello Doug. I definitely have to agree agree with William that there is nothing too profound about…"
59 minutes ago
William F Rushby commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'Biblical Inerrancy Watch: the Evangelical Free Church of America'
"I don't find anything very remarkable about this statement of faith in the Bible.  If I…"
11 hours ago
James C Schultz commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'Biblical Inerrancy Watch: the Evangelical Free Church of America'
"One of the versions of the bible that was popular when i first got "saved" was the…"
14 hours ago
Doug Bennett posted a blog post
14 hours ago
Irene Lape commented on Irene Lape's blog post 'Daily Old Testament and Early Christian Writings: Numbers 31-32 and Origen's De Principiis: Book One - 6-7'
"It is true, we are in many ways, bound by the time we know we are in; but what is so amazing about…"
15 hours ago
Paul Smith commented on Irene Lape's blog post 'Daily Old Testament and Early Christian Writings: Numbers 31-32 and Origen's De Principiis: Book One - 6-7'
"I have gradually become aware that I conceive of God in human likeness because I have no language…"
15 hours ago
Paul Smith liked Irene Lape's blog post Daily Old Testament and Early Christian Writings: Numbers 31-32 and Origen's De Principiis: Book One - 6-7
15 hours ago
Randy Oftedahl commented on Randy Oftedahl's blog post 'What Divides Us and What Unites Us'
"Thank you, Friends, for your comments.  David, I appreciate what you have to say, though…"
18 hours ago

About QuakerQuaker

QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.

Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List

 

Advertise:

Learn about QQ Advertising

Place an Order

The QuakerQuaker Audience

Quakers

© 2013   Created by QuakerQuaker.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service