A walk through time out of Time. Manifesting those Quakers out of all Appearances.

A walk through time out of Time. Manifesting those Quakers out of all Appearances.

Thirty years ago, I had an experience of seeing a different way of being, conscience and consciousness. It was a glimpse of a glimpse that held fast and true in the far periphery of Life; kissing consciousness. In that moment, I became Quaker. However, Quaker of a different sort.

For twenty years I have attended Quaker Assemblies of various sorts. There was a time I almost sought membership in the Ohio Yearly Meeting. Yet, I was not led into membership. Through the appearance of the spirit of Jesus Christ inshining upon my conscience and reforming the very foundation of my consciousness, it was becoming clear I was on a different path. It was not of a communal or autonomous nature. Many convinced Quakers testify to the need for community and how a particular Quaker gathering had supplied that need. I sensed no such need. This experience of conscience and consciousness being nurtured and established by the Spirit of Christ enthroned within, was becoming and became sufficient in itself to satisfy and sustain consciousness and identity in this new Life. It is not that I do not value gathering for worship; it is that my conscience and consciousness is ruled and guided outside of concorporate (communal) and self-regulated (individualistic) contexts or paradigms. The immanent Presence of Christ itself in itself is become the source or seed of consciousness, life, and identity without regard for outward self-centered and/or communal contexts or constructs. I am come out of the communal and individual dynamic. I am of a Christonomous1 nature.

Over time and through study, it has become clear that a different sort of Quakerism has existed (throughout the whole of its history) alongside the outwardly established formal Quakerism. It is a blessing that many Christonomous Quakers navigated the minefield of derision and denunciation that early Quaker establishment Leaders laid before their paths and published their testimony to their witness. It is also a blessing the many establishment Quaker leaders wrote against the Christonomous Quakers. For, in writing against them, they manifest their existence. There is very strong evidence and proof of the Christonomous way, distinct from the way established and enforced by other Quakers led to establish outwardly visible forms, doctrines, and practices to guide the Quaker gathering.

For example, the eminent minister Stephen Crisp wrote in 1666 of some Quakers in An Epistle to Friends Concerning Present and Succeeding Times who ‘… have no Keeper, but the Measure of Light revealed in their Hearts and Consciences …’ (From a 1780 edition, pg 9). Essentially, Crisp is lamenting those Quakers who do not follow or come to the touch of the established Quaker outward forms and ceremonies (for example, not removing their hat during prayer). Crisp here clearly enunciates those people in the gathering who are come out of the process of participation in and identification with all outward forms, practices, and ceremonies. It is telling that the testimony by some early Friends in the gathering of having no *Keeper* but their measure of Light in their conscience is troublesome to Crisp. This short sentence is a precise definition of the Christonomous Friend.

In the very title of another epistle, Stephen Crisp, writes: An Epistle from Stephen Crisp to Friends against such as cry out against the Form of Godliness, as against Meeting at set Times, on First Days, etc. The mere title highlights people in the gathering who scrupled against the very process of establishing Meetings at set times and days. In this tract he writes of those in the gathering who experience ‘… leading out of Formality into the Power.’ Here Crisp specifically manifests a people who were led out of the very process of identification with and participation in Formalities. It is of no matter that Crisp is here interested in denigrating those Quakers who are come out of formalities. The point in this discussion is to show there were in fact many in the gathering who testified to the witness of coming out of Formalities and Crisp gives strong proof of their presence in the Gathering even though he contended with Christonomous people.

It is significant and telling to note that Crisp in the title of the second epistle mentioned writes of … such as cry against the Form of Godliness … For many people in the early Quaker gatherings like Crisp, forms themselves were not so much the issue as whether those forms are Godly or in the Power of God. George Fox in his Concerning those that go out of Unity and Deny Forms writes:

“they go out of all true forms, into confusion and emptiness, without form; then they say, they will not be subject to forms, and cry down all forms with their darkness and a perverse spirit, and so mash all together. “

“For there is a form of godliness, and there is a form of sound words; many have a form.”

They mash all together. That is, those who are come out of forms do not distinguish between Godly and Ungodly forms. Fox is here very perceptive. Not only do they go out of ungodly forms, they are come out of the process of identification with and participation in all true forms. Here again, is a testimony of a contending Quaker bringing light upon people in the gathering of Friends who testify to the witness of coming out of all appearances or forms.

George Fox, in his Journal (1709 Vol. 2 pg. 333), writes of those who deny prescriptions without distinction. That is, they make no distinction between godly and ungodly prescriptions because they are come out of all outward forms and prescriptions to guide their conscience.

There are many many more examples I can document to show the existence of a people in the earliest history of the Quaker gathering who specifically testified to the appearance of the inshining Light upon their conscience and consciousness and the resulting experience of being come out of the process of their relationships and interactions being guided and informed by outward, forms, practices, prescriptions, ceremonies, and institutions. Theirs is a powerful testimony and one that speaks to many people today and all along the history of Quakerism. Those of us who know this christonomous experience can embrace and trace our spiritual heritage back to the first or earliest of Quakers. We can stand in the light of Quaker history and sense our heritage in the words of Nathanial Smith (excommunicated from the gathering by George Fox for his unwillingness to comply with the Quaker establishment), who wrote in 1669:

“Whereas I have given thee an account of their Courts, it is but to let thee understand, that all Sects, Formes, or other Dispensations, if thou please to call them so, (or by what Name so ever) after they have raised to themselves a considerable number of People, then they go about to set up themselves, and make to themselves Laws, whereby they may Govern, and bear Rule one over another; for these People called the Quakers were the only People that did speak against this, and said, That man ought to fear God, and to walk justly before him, and be taught of him; but now they have a Rule or a Light to walk by, (a rather a Law) and if any do not observe this, then he is cast out from amongst them, as not being one of the Flock of God.”

  1. 1. I use Christonomous or Christonomy to express the experience of being come out of all visible appearances formalities and institutions to guide and inform human relationships and interactions through the appearance of the immanent Presence of Jesus Christ (being sufficient itself in itself) informing the conscience and anchoring the consciousness.

Views: 221

Comment by Howard Brod on 12th mo. 9, 2018 at 1:40pm


I want to state that there are a noticeable number of liberal Quaker meetings that conscientiously function in a manner that you describe ("Christonomously" to use your word), and do so even though perhaps the majority of meetings within their Yearly Meeting do not. Yet, most (if not all) liberal yearly meetings do support the leadings of each local meeting that associates with the yearly meeting, and these yearly meetings respect any choices made by these "Christomonous" local meetings whether their choices reinforce the choices of the yearly meeting or not.  I see the liberal Quaker tradition as a very wide tent that joyfully embraces all local choices - not just in word, but in actions as well.  This is much different than the Quaker hierarchy that was in place after the implementation of Forms by George Fox and his associates. Modern liberal yearly meetings are simply a voluntary network association of Quakers - period.  They are not governing bodies as are many of the yearly meetings among evangelical and more theologically conservative Quakers.

In fact the whole history of the liberal Quaker tradition since its origin in 1828 has been a steady (albeit, slow) recognition of the validity of "an experience of seeing a different way of being, conscience and consciousness".  Now historically, liberal Quakerism is at the point where it has now fully embraced spiritual liberty as the path to a fulfilling spiritual life. To most liberal Quakers it is clear that this way of experiencing the Spirit is the essence of the message provided by Jesus himself, and is especially well-suited for the 21st century.

It is clear to liberal Quakers (as it was to Jesus) that any reliance on forms (be it doctrines, holy books, hierarchies, labels, etc.) tends to divide us from each other.  Whereas reliance on the living Spirit - the Light and Love that is ever among and within us - is the clear answer for humanity.  This is because such is our true essence; rather than the notions (the FORMS) instituted by humans to gratify the ego or qualm our fears.

I believe it will take some more time before all meetings within liberal Quakerism fully embrace the removal of unnecessary forms to a greater extent.  I do believe it will happen because that has been our history and it continues to manifest within liberal Quakerism.

Comment by Keith Saylor on 12th mo. 10, 2018 at 3:14pm

Hello Howard,

It is encouraging to read your testimony concerning the in shining impulse and workings of the chrislonomous Spirit in Liberal Quaker Meetings. Thank you for shining light on this manifestation of the Spirit in our Meetings today.

Your affirmation of the current increase, and further future increase, of the enthronement of the Life itself in the conscience and consciousness of people is refreshment to my soul and buoys determination to embrace the burden of the Light.

I’ve been steeped in keyboarding various seventeenth century Quaker Texts as supplements to Rogers The Christian Quaker. Alongside this effort, I am building integrating a web component that will host the texts I keyboard. This component has evolved over the last two years; as I have struggled with a comfortable and appealing texture. There is much work still
to realize its fruition in the Ten year time allotment.

In any case, I’d like to share with you some words from a text I am currently keyboarding. By way of background. In 1666, eleven Quakers published and disseminated a letter giving advise and instruction to Quakers on how to order their relationships. You may read the Letter (published on the web component above mentioned) by clicking on the link to the right - 1666 Disciplinary Letter. Considering reading this short letter before reading further. It was document by some contemporary Quakers (and Non-Quakers) that this letter was not embraced by many Quakers.

Now, in 1673, a tract entitled “Tyranny and Hypocrisy Detect (this text is also being keyboarded, but is not yet completed.), was published. In that tract, a response to the Letter is recorded from Quaker George Bishop.

His response shook me to the very foundation of my consciousness. It echoed and quaked my being. The ramification of his words in response to the Letter of the eleven Quakers goes to the core of the spiritual experience of many Quakers throughout the history of the Gathering of Friends!

Here are a couple short quotations from Bishop’s Response:

  1. The Spirit of the Lord in this day, and in the days of the Apostles bears not the same proportion: then were Apostles, Pastors, Teachers, Elders, &c. but in this day the Spirit it self is Pastor, Teachers, Elders, &c.
  2. The Seed is come in which the Ministry is to end.

Link to Text of Bishop’s Response

Here we have a Quaker who, in response to the Letter of the eleven, affirms, unequivocally and without hesitation, that the Spirit of the Lord itself is Pastor! And that because of this the ministry (outward forms of instruction) is in the process of ending. I have no doubt George Bishop had I Corinthians chapters twelve and thirteen in mind as he wrote.

This kind of documentation of first and early Quakers who questioned following the Lead of other Quakers who promoted and professed the establishment of outward forms over against the conscience and consciousness of other Quakers in the Gathering, is so very important for Quakers today who are come into the sufficiency of the immanent Presence of Christ to Rule and Guide their relationships and interactions. It is important because we can embrace a spiritual heritage that goes back to the very beginnings of the gathering of the Children of Light.

With gratitude for your edifying conversation.

Comment by Howard Brod on 12th mo. 10, 2018 at 4:39pm

Thank you Keith for all the work you are doing to re-establish this important history of early Quakerism that is so akin to liberal Quakerism in our day.  Appreciation of the experience of the inward Light is so important to liberal Quakers.  So, it is helpful to be provided an additional understanding that unneeded reliance on forms serves as a type of "religious mediator"; which many of the earliest Friends avoided so the inward Light would not be dimmed. 


You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Matthew Callow replied to Aaron J Levitt's discussion 'Led to song?'
"Aaron, At a Meeting for Worship many years ago, my heart was weighed heavy with grief, so I…"
5th day (Thu)
Mitchell Pearson posted a photo
4th day (Wed)
Mitchell Pearson liked Mitchell Pearson's profile
4th day (Wed)
Ransome Reed updated their profile
4th day (Wed)
Ransome Reed liked Aaron J Levitt's discussion Led to song?
4th day (Wed)
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

When the season of the outward ministration of others is passed and fulfilled in the everliving presence of Christ.

In an article published in The Friends Journal entitled "A Parallel Universe" the author writes:The…See More
5th month 19
Keith Saylor replied to Matthew Callow's discussion '“A general dyet, estates or parliament” for the nations of Europe'
"Matthew, I appreciate the time and effort you put into looking at the texts. I will spend some time…"
5th month 19
William F Rushby replied to Aaron J Levitt's discussion 'Led to song?'
"https://muse.jhu.edu/article/394004/pdf [ This content has been declared free to read by the…"
5th month 18

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service