Peace is the prerogative of Immanent Presence working in the conscience.

Through the inshining witness of immanent Presence (God) upon the conscience it is discovered that the very act of engaging in and identifying with the outward political contrivance of peace, in itself, creates and nurtures the occasion for war. In the Power, peace is an experience that is come and that is coming in the conscience and consciousness. Immanent Presence itself in itself, living in the conscience, and the activity of living in the power in all things and circumstances in daily life is peace manifested on the earth. The process of a conscience and consciousness guided and informed by participation in and identification with outward powers and principalities to realize an outward peace is out of the the power of Immanent Presence and serves the peace and war dynamic by usurping the prerogative of the inshining Light itself to manifest peace. The striving for peace through outward political contrivance will not manifest peace in the world, it only serves to nurture war and conflict.

Views: 25

Comment by Forrest Curo on 2nd mo. 8, 2018 at 12:10pm

Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God, traitors, blasphemous meddlers with Divinely-ordained oppression and violence.

Comment by Keith Saylor on 2nd mo. 12, 2018 at 4:41pm

A recent post on quakerquaker (http://www.quakerquaker.org/profiles/blogs/sa-ed-atshan-on-the-quak...) shares a summary of an interview published in Friends Journal. In that interview these words are published.


In peace and conflict studies, we teach our students to embrace conflict. We teach our students that conflict is important and we should not avoid it. It’s the way we resolve our differences and address our misunderstandings or disagreements. But it’s important to raise conflict in a way that transforms it.


Their are a number of current Quaker bloggers who have shared and promoted the outward principle of peace through conflict. It is refreshing the read a educator who admits that he embraces conflict in the pursuit of peace. Adherence to the principle of embracing conflict in the pursuit of peace is one of the fundamental assumptions that marks a consciousness anchored in and a conscience informed by outward political and religious principles, moral, ethics, and the institutions that promote them, for it is of the very nature of identification with and participation in outward forms, ideologies, and institutions to manifest and embrace conflict through agitation.


The interviewee is also quoted as saying:


When instead we avoid conflict, we become passive aggressive, and the underlying issues continue to simmer.


Certainly the avoidance of conflict can lead to passive aggression and further conflict among those people whose consciousness is anchored in and whose conscience is informed by outward political and religious constructs and contrivances, however, the interviewee seems only interested in supporting the principle of conflict in pursuit of peace by suggesting the denial of his principle can only lead to passive aggression. This is not true. There is another way.


This different way is of a different nature or essential being than that promoted in this interview. There is a Life wherein all outward principles or principalities are laid down. In this different consciousness and different conscience, immanent Presence takes form in the consciousness and conscience and it is discovered and directly experienced that all outward principles (like embracing conflict in the pursuit of peace) no longer inform or guide the conscience. The power of these outward principles to agitate, rule, inform, and guide, the conscience is lost in the formation of immanent Presence as sole and sufficient guide. Truly, there is no occasion for conflict in pursuit of peace because Peace itself is come and is taken form in the conscience. The experience of coming out of adherence to, identification with, and participation in, outward political and religious constructs, contrivances, and institutions and coming into identification with and participation in immanent Presence itself in itself as sole and sufficient guide in all matters of human relationships is the neutralization of the power of those leaders, teachers, and institutions who seek to control and inform people through a identification with and participation in their outward political and religious constructs and contrivance. Most people who promote adherence to outward principles do not acknowledge or speak to this different experience of being ruled and governed by the Life of itself in itself on this earth, for it negates their power and the outward principalities they support and promote.


It is to be appreciated that this article manifests the truth, by the interviewee’s own admission, that consciousness anchored in and a conscience informed by outward principles and institutions promote, encourage, and embraceconflict in the pursuit of peace. These peacemakers use conflict in their pursuit of peace.


Personally, I am thankful I am come out of such a way of relating to other human beings and, through the appearance of the inshining Light itself and the formation of immanent Presence in my consciousness and conscience, I am come into a life that knows Peace itself in itself in my human relationships and activities upon this earth. I am come out of a life that seeks, pursues, and promises a peace through conflict by promoting adherence to and using the outward political and religious ideology, contrivance, principles, and institutional weapons of war over against human being and relationships to resolve in the pursuit of peace. Such a way, is no different than using outward military weapons of war against human beings and relationships.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 2nd mo. 12, 2018 at 5:42pm

You don't seem to get what people mean by a phrase like "embracing conflict."

It does sound silly, but it doesn't mean starting a conflict or harming people to get your way.

It's more like recognizing a conflict when it exists -- like engaging with that fact rather than trying to avoid saying that those nice people you're called to protest against aren't treating their victims cruelly.

Comment by Keith Saylor on 2nd mo. 12, 2018 at 5:57pm

Your response doesn’t acknowledge the full nuance. The reality is much more dynamic  than it seems you wish to admit. There is definitely a sense of nurturing conflict and even promoting it. I experience it when I’m on the street sharing the sufficiency of the inshining Light to political activists, irrespective of their outward political identity.

Comment by Forrest Curo on 2nd mo. 12, 2018 at 7:50pm

Human beings, whether activist or inactivist, do have ambiguous feelings towards conflict.

It is an unpleasant nuisance, but it's a feature necessary to their stories. It gives everyone something to do.

But there's no shortage. In a pinch, people can stir up a conflict over nothing; but generally one just needs to keep one's eyes open.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Keith Saylor commented on Allistair Lomax's blog post 'A Review of Derek's Guiton's Book: A Man that Looks on Glass: Standing up for God'
"Shared Impressions —- Chapter 5, pg. 59,60 “... as the Society of Friends is steadily…"
1 hour ago
Keith Saylor commented on Allistair Lomax's blog post 'A Review of Derek's Guiton's Book: A Man that Looks on Glass: Standing up for God'
"Thank you for your question Allistair. Yes I can site evidence. But first. As I wrote, my previous…"
1 hour ago
Keith Saylor commented on Anne Hutchinson's blog post 'Thoughts upon my Return from Africa'
"Hello Anne, Thank you for sharing this beautiful piece. There is so much beauty even in the midst…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor posted a blog post
yesterday
Keith Saylor commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Sa’ed Atshan: On the Quaker practice of embracing conflict'
"Thank you Mike. I am open to your to your understanding of Atshan. To make sure I understand you…"
yesterday
Earlham School of Religion posted an event
Thumbnail

2018 ESR Willson Lectures/Trueblood Symposium: Process Theology at Earlham School of Religion

4th mo. 6, 2018 at 6pm to 4th mo. 7, 2018 at 11:30am
Join us for the 2018 Willson Lectures/Trueblood Symposium April 6-7 featuring keynote speaker…See More
yesterday
Mike Shell commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Sa’ed Atshan: On the Quaker practice of embracing conflict'
"Friend Keith, Thanks very much for your February 17th comment. I agree with what you write…"
3rd day (Tue)
Mike Shell commented on Mike Shell's blog post 'Sa’ed Atshan: On the Quaker practice of embracing conflict'
"Friend Keith, Thanks very much for your February 17th comment. I agree with what you write…"
3rd day (Tue)

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service