May 19, 2013

Views: 166

Comment by Bill Samuel on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 10:15am

May the NAF be a body through which the living water flows into our society.

Comment by Jim Wilson on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 3:28pm

Sounds promising.  I am curious; is the NAF intended to be an Indiana Association, or does it plan outreach beyond that?

Comment by Doug Bennett on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 7:00pm

A composite answer to Jim Wilson's question from NAF folks including Margaret Fraser, Michael Sherman, Annie Glen and Leigh Ruddick Eason. 

We are moving slowly and deliberately; small steps. Members of many of these meetings are bruised from the IYM schism and want first to find their way back to trusting a new organization. 

First, have invited meetings that are leaving Indiana YM. (That means already there are monthly meetings in NAF in Ohio and Michigan.) Next, individuals who are members of meetings that are either staying in Indiana YM or going independent but not joining the New Association. That's where we are today. We are also in conversation with a couple of independent meetings in the midwest, inviting them to check us out to see if they might like to join. We probably won't go much further than that this year because we don't want to destabilize other yearly meetings.

We have about 800 members now; and we hear that another meeting will be making a decision next weekend about possibly joining us, which would bring us up to fourteen. We expect that to increase steadily. We are very diverse, theologically, and many of us don't know each other, so we are trying to lay some foundations. Considering where things stood at the beginning of the year, it's very encouraging. One of the things we will be looking at is the way in which we might do clearness for people wanting to join from beyond the Indiana/ Ohio/ Michigan area.

The hope is to provide a home for Friends near and far who are willing to worship and fellowship as well as associate with us. But that is one person's voice only.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Forrest Curo posted a discussion

Why, Why Not: Collective Quaker Discernment Processes

God may 'be on' more than one side of a disagreement.The truth about an issue might not match the…See More
8 hours ago
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

Online Version of William Rogers 1680 text "The Christian Quaker..."

In 1680 Friend William Rogers published a book documenting why some founding Friends were not of…See More
19 hours ago
Forrest Curo replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'In Charlotte ...'
"I think we've agreed that opposite sides of this conflict feed into one another. I don't…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'In Charlotte ...'
"The subject of this thread is: "There is a need for Quakers in Charlotte with the message of…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'In Charlotte ...'
"Is this the sort of experience of Jesus that came to GW Bush to encourage him to bomb Iraq? -- or…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'In Charlotte ...'
""and an idolatrous attitude towards one mode of transmission over another simply facilitates…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Keith Saylor's discussion 'In Charlotte ...'
"I've done my own idolatries and self-deceptions, hence have no reason to accuse anyone of…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'A Break in the Political Clouds'
"The friendship between Pierre & Prince Anrei is certainly worth a close look. Andrei is an…"
yesterday

© 2016   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service