May 19, 2013

Views: 177

Comment by Bill Samuel on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 10:15am

May the NAF be a body through which the living water flows into our society.

Comment by Jim Wilson on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 3:28pm

Sounds promising.  I am curious; is the NAF intended to be an Indiana Association, or does it plan outreach beyond that?

Comment by Doug Bennett on 5th mo. 20, 2013 at 7:00pm

A composite answer to Jim Wilson's question from NAF folks including Margaret Fraser, Michael Sherman, Annie Glen and Leigh Ruddick Eason. 

We are moving slowly and deliberately; small steps. Members of many of these meetings are bruised from the IYM schism and want first to find their way back to trusting a new organization. 

First, have invited meetings that are leaving Indiana YM. (That means already there are monthly meetings in NAF in Ohio and Michigan.) Next, individuals who are members of meetings that are either staying in Indiana YM or going independent but not joining the New Association. That's where we are today. We are also in conversation with a couple of independent meetings in the midwest, inviting them to check us out to see if they might like to join. We probably won't go much further than that this year because we don't want to destabilize other yearly meetings.

We have about 800 members now; and we hear that another meeting will be making a decision next weekend about possibly joining us, which would bring us up to fourteen. We expect that to increase steadily. We are very diverse, theologically, and many of us don't know each other, so we are trying to lay some foundations. Considering where things stood at the beginning of the year, it's very encouraging. One of the things we will be looking at is the way in which we might do clearness for people wanting to join from beyond the Indiana/ Ohio/ Michigan area.

The hope is to provide a home for Friends near and far who are willing to worship and fellowship as well as associate with us. But that is one person's voice only.

Comment

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile
3rd day (Tue)
Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile photo
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Here's a Youtube to get the ball rolling: https://youtu.be/4VJirp2TRZY I see parallels with…"
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Few contemporaries simultaneously have the reputation for being great and wise religious leaders,…"
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I have no reason to doubt that. Some Quakers are really into theology, and once that' s your…"
3rd day (Tue)
Forrest Curo commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"What does God [feel free to interpret this in whatever way you so-far envision the Life and Soul in…"
3rd day (Tue)
David McKay commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"Not with-it enough to speak to "we just don't care if you think in terms of a Trinity or…"
2nd day (Mon)
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I go back to Karen Armstrong's observation that Protestantism stands out in its focus on…"
2nd day (Mon)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service