Rodney James Perkins
  • Almaty
  • Kazakhstan
Share on Facebook
  • Blogs
  • Discussions
  • Quaker Gatherings
  • Quaker Beliefs/Groups
  • Quaker Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Quaker Videos
 

Rodney James Perkins's Page

Profile Information

About Me
I joined Friends in 1968 after concluding that the usual churches were not following the message of Jesus of Nazareth, while the Quakers were at least making some sort of attempt. From time to time I was active, idle, inspired, disillusioned, regular, irregular.... (As most Friends are, I observe.) However, more and more I became convinced that Christianity, as represented by the conventional churches and the creeds is objectively wrong. Early Friends were very clear about this. I was more and more embarrassed by being associated with war-mongering and lying Christian politicians. (You know who they are.) I happened to meet a number of people who had clearly been psychologically damaged by their association with various churches. During my time on Meeting for Sufferings in the early 90s I was concerned about the way that relations with the churches were handled and when Yearly Meeting decided to continue in 'Churches Together in Britain and Ireland' I
resigned my membership, while continuing to attend meeting when I could.

I now call myself a 'New Muggletonian'. The Muggletonians were among the strongest critics of Quakers in the middle of the 17th century. (Remarkably they lasted into the 20th century.) I took the name (but only, I hope, the name!) on the model of 'New Labour', that is to say the policies of the 'New' organisation would be directly opposed to those of the 'Old' body, in fact close to those of the 'Old' group's opponents. (That's to say you could hardly distinguish a New Muggletonian from a Quaker.) Lodowicke Muggleton had the most bizarre ideas, it must be admitted. Apart from that the phrase 'New Muggletonian ' messes-up many official documents, as it won't fit in the box provided, which appeals to the anachist side of my personality.
Twitter Page
http://twitter.com/#NewMuggleton

Meetups, Events, and Resources

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Christ's living appearance within me has drawn me out of the reflective nature and the process…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"God is also more than anyone's experience of God. It's not that we can contain God in a…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Hello Thomas, Through the immanent appearance of eternal life itself inshining upon me, I am drawn…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
3rd day (Tue)
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
3rd day (Tue)
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd day (Mon)
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd day (Mon)
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"It's probably best to talk about many Biblical concepts of God. What they have in common is…"
2nd month 20

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service