Anne E Wright
  • Hartsdale, NY
  • United States
Share on Facebook
  • Blogs
  • Discussions (2)
  • Quaker Gatherings
  • Quaker Beliefs/Groups
  • Quaker Photos
  • Photo Albums
  • Quaker Videos

Anne E Wright's Discussions

What we mean by what we say

Started this discussion. Last reply by David Carl 2nd month 20, 2013. 6 Replies

Friends, in a recent quarterly meeting in a presentation on Quaker Leadership we assembled were asked for an example of something that would be considered a "rule" in our meeting for discussion of…Continue

Tags: of, business, meeting, conduct, rules

 

Anne E Wright's Page

Latest Activity

David Carl replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"So how might a clerk respond to a Friend honoring this practice in the breach?"
2nd month 20, 2013
Tom Smith replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"My experience in Meeting for Business would support the statement in F & P (of which YM?) "It is Quaker custom, too, for persons who have once expressed their views clearly and adequately not to address the meeting again." However, my…"
2nd month 12, 2013
Howard Brod replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"I think a Quaker custom stated in Faith and Practice should carry a lot of weight, simply because Friends have put in lots of time and experience to arrive at that place. So there must have been a good reason for writing it down. This makes it worth…"
2nd month 12, 2013
Anne E Wright replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"Clem, In my Christian growing up I learned that we don't live over or in the dead body of Jesus, we live in the body of the risen Christ. Thanks for responding to my question.  "
2nd month 11, 2013
Lawrence Cullen Jones replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"This discussion is another indicator that some friends, and meetings, are not aware of what is customary in meeting for worship with concern for business.   It is true that proceedings need not be ponderous, nevertheless they should…"
2nd month 11, 2013
Lawrence Cullen Jones liked Anne E Wright's discussion What we mean by what we say
2nd month 11, 2013
Clem Gerdelmann replied to Anne E Wright's discussion 'What we mean by what we say'
"Annie, unfortunately, many Friends' faith is privately, at least, "over my dead body" as opposed to the customary/primitive Quaker belief of "over His dead body". Therein lies both the challenge to die to (one)self and the…"
2nd month 8, 2013
Kent Wicker liked Anne E Wright's discussion What we mean by what we say
2nd month 7, 2013
Anne E Wright posted a discussion

What we mean by what we say

Friends, in a recent quarterly meeting in a presentation on Quaker Leadership we assembled were asked for an example of something that would be considered a "rule" in our meeting for discussion of how Friends and attenders learn what is OK and what is not in meeting and in Quaker practice. I suggested "Friends should speak only once to a matter under discussion." A weighty Friend among us stated that was just an assumption peculiar to some meetings (not his) and not part of our practice. So, as…See More
2nd month 6, 2013

Profile Information

About Me
Daughter, sister, wife, aunt, friend, Quaker, energetic, full of ideas, loved and loving; photographer, singer; 20+ years a nurse practitioner; one of the founders of an "intentional family" in the 70's and we're still here! in the process of reflecting on and renewing myself since retirement. I have recently decided that my present goal is to move back to center, deepen my roots, and listen.

Meetups, Events, and Resources

You need to be a member of QuakerQuaker to add comments!

Join QuakerQuaker

  • No comments yet!
 
 
 

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Kirby Urner posted a blog post
4 hours ago
William F Rushby posted a discussion
21 hours ago
William F Rushby replied to Anne's discussion 'Conservative but not?'
"Anne asks: " Can one be Conservative Quaker + (something)?" I reply that I am a…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'How Do We Explain This'
"There is a different experience of the nature of leading among those who live and remain in the…"
yesterday
David McKay replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'How Do We Explain This'
"My suspicions are similar to yours Forrest; while I am not as ardently anti-nuclear as yourself I…"
7th day (Sat)
James C Schultz replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'How Do We Explain This'
"If the leading didn't go further than her local monthly meeting, I would suggest that the…"
7th day (Sat)
Forrest Curo posted a discussion

How Do We Explain This

I'm not sure of her current status; but a few years ago a good and well-intentioned young woman got…See More
7th day (Sat)
Kirby Urner commented on James C Schultz's blog post 'Revelation vs. Opionion'
"I see Quakerism itself as a bold experiment in some design *other than* all getting behind a pastor…"
7th day (Sat)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service