Carnival: Rob Bell and the Paradox of Christian Universalism

Information

Carnival: Rob Bell and the Paradox of Christian Universalism

3/2011 Carnival: Rob Bell and the controversy surrounding his supposed turn toward Christian Universalism.

If you write about the topic, bookmark it in Delicious as "quaker.robbell" or post to the comments below.

Members: 17
Latest Activity: 10th month 25, 2013

About the Blog Carnival

A blog Carnival is a opportunity for bloggers to write about a shared topic for a month. It's an old idea we're trying again here on QuakerQuaker. For this first "Quaker Carnival" we've picked Rob Bell and the controversy surrounding his supposed stance of Christian Universalism. For more, read "What's a Carnival and why Rob Bell?"

 

Background:

Rob Bell is the founding pastor of Mars Hill Bible Church located in Grand Rapids, Michigan. He is also the featured speaker in a series of spiritual short films called NOOMA. These films have been very popular with alt-Christians, including a lot of people associated with the "Convergent Friends" movement. He's recently started a firestorm on Christian blogs because a new video promoting his forthcoming book, Love Wins, appears to embrace Christian Universalism.

 

Some Mainstream Christian Commentary on the Controversy:

Discussion Forum

What's a Carnival and Why Rob Bell?

Started by Martin Kelley. Last reply by Victoria Pearson 3rd month 21, 2011. 5 Replies

The QuakerQuaker team has long kicked around the idea of sponsoring "Quaker Carnivals," monthly themes that bloggers are invited to write about. Wess Daniels over at Gathering in Light brought up the…Continue

Tags: carnival, quaker.robbell

On the Blogs

Loading… Loading feed

Meetups, Events, and Resources

Comment

You need to be a member of Carnival: Rob Bell and the Paradox of Christian Universalism to add comments!

Comment by Cherice on 3rd mo. 31, 2011 at 3:17pm
Comment by Jim Wilson on 3rd mo. 25, 2011 at 3:36pm

Dear Friends:

 

Roger Olson, an Arminian Theologian, has today posted a brief comment on Rob Bells' book.  According to Olson, Bell does not advocate for an heretical universalism and Olson thinks many critics owe him an apology.  You can find his post at:

 

rogerolson.com

 

The title of the post is "The Promised Response to Bell's Love Wins".

 

Enjoy,

 

Jim

 

Comment by C. Wess Daniels on 3rd mo. 7, 2011 at 2:39pm
Jarrod McKenna - australian friend wrote a good post as well - http://www.redletterchristians.org/love-wins-rob-bell-and-the-new-c...
Comment by Michael Jay on 3rd mo. 7, 2011 at 1:33am
http://michaeldavidjay.wordpress.com/2011/03/03/facebook-challenge-...

In one of my comments to my own VERY brief essay, I linked to some longer essays. Mine is just an answer to a face-book comment.
 

Members (16)

 
 
 

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Forrest: You have packed some heavy judgments into two short paragraphs, with no or very meager…"
46 minutes ago
Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Perhaps, then, lack of "faith" (as people typically misconceive it) is less of a barrier…"
4 hours ago
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"When God takes the initiative, even the recalcitrant can be converted.  With God, all things…"
6 hours ago
Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Um, where were we? Thanks, however, for that last example of how not to read scripture. If it were…"
13 hours ago
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"I don't really have a sophisticated definition of "nontheist" to offer.  I…"
23 hours ago
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello William, Thank you for that important correction. The specific quote that prompted my…"
yesterday
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello, Keith! "Atheist" is now a naughty word that is not politically correct! …"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello William, When you reflect upon another another person as atheist, how are you using that…"
yesterday

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service