Primitive Christianity Revived, Again
This month we'll look at how Friends support, guide and correct one another. We Friends often talk about taking someone or something "under our care." When someone's married in the meetinghouse, that marriage is under its care. When a new worship group is forming, we try to find a nearby meeting to take it under its care. And at the most basic level, there's some expectation of care when an individual joins a meeting. There's an intentionality to this relationship, a formality that we might describe as "convental."
But what exactly does all this mean? The corporate body of a meeting might agree to something but what burden does that put on the individuals of a meeting? It can be hard to strike the right balance. In my own experiences, I've seen meetings too quickly sign off on projects which they are not really committed to, and I've seen the reverse—paralyzing hand-wringing around a decision that should come easily.
How have you experienced care? Have you given it? Have you gotten too much care, in the form of unwanted attention. What is the kind of care you want from your spiritual community? Does your Friends meeting or church have structures in place for care?
Friends to care is to belong. When someone joins a Meeting and are under the Care of that Meeting, it must be evident that to join a Meeting and be placed under the Care thereof, is not just as…Continue
Started by Simon Marc 5th month 5, 2011.
Loading feed
Comment
Comment by Cherice on 5th mo. 17, 2011 at 11:26pm QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.
Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List
Support:
Make a One-Time Online Donation (Paypal)
Paul Box joined QuakerQuaker's group
Dr. Bruce R. Arnold posted a blog post
Howard Brod replied to Missy's discussion 'Where's the Quaker in Quaker?'
Olivia commented on Alice M Yaxley's blog post 'God's livelihoods?'
James C Schultz replied to Aaron Clark's discussion 'The Differences Between Christians And Quakers'
Olivia replied to Missy's discussion 'Where's the Quaker in Quaker?'
David Nelson Seaman commented on Kevin Camp's blog post 'Radical Acceptance: When an Attender is a Sex Offender'© 2012 Created by QuakerQuaker.
You need to be a member of Carnival: How Do We Care? to add comments!