Carnival: How Do We Care?

Information

Carnival: How Do We Care?

Discussion Carnival, 5th Month 2011: How do we take one another "under our care?"

Tag in Delicious as "quaker.care" or post to comments below

Members: 7
Latest Activity: 5th month 17, 2011

Discussion Carnival: How Do We Care?

This month we'll look at how Friends support, guide and correct one another. We Friends often talk about taking someone or something "under our care." When someone's married in the meetinghouse, that marriage is under its care. When a new worship group is forming, we try to find a nearby meeting to take it under its care. And at the most basic level, there's some expectation of care when an individual joins a meeting. There's an intentionality to this relationship, a formality that we might describe as "convental."

But what exactly does all this mean? The corporate body of a meeting might agree to something but what burden does that put on the individuals of a meeting? It can be hard to strike the right balance. In my own experiences, I've seen meetings too quickly sign off on projects which they are not really committed to, and I've seen the reverse—paralyzing hand-wringing around a decision that should come easily. 

How have you experienced care? Have you given it? Have you gotten too much care, in the form of unwanted attention. What is the kind of care you want from your spiritual community? Does your Friends meeting or church have structures in place for care?

Discussion Forum

To Care is to Belong

Started by Simon Marc 5th month 5, 2011. 0 Replies

 Friends to care is to belong.  When someone joins a Meeting and are under the Care of that Meeting,  it must be evident that to join a Meeting and be placed under the Care thereof, is not just as…Continue

On the Blogs: tagged "quaker.care"

Loading… Loading feed

Meetups, Events, and Resources

Comment

You need to be a member of Carnival: How Do We Care? to add comments!

Comment by Cherice on 5th mo. 17, 2011 at 11:26pm
Comment by Michael Jay on 5th mo. 4, 2011 at 11:35pm
 

Members (7)

 
 
 

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile
3rd day (Tue)
Christopher Alexander Eaton updated their profile photo
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Here's a Youtube to get the ball rolling: https://youtu.be/4VJirp2TRZY I see parallels with…"
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner replied to Kirby Urner's discussion 'Quakerism and Charter Schools'
"Few contemporaries simultaneously have the reputation for being great and wise religious leaders,…"
3rd day (Tue)
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I have no reason to doubt that. Some Quakers are really into theology, and once that' s your…"
3rd day (Tue)
Forrest Curo commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"What does God [feel free to interpret this in whatever way you so-far envision the Life and Soul in…"
3rd day (Tue)
David McKay commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"Not with-it enough to speak to "we just don't care if you think in terms of a Trinity or…"
2nd day (Mon)
Kirby Urner commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Founding Quakerism: “Their chief design... to reduce Religion to Allegory?”'
"I go back to Karen Armstrong's observation that Protestantism stands out in its focus on…"
2nd day (Mon)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service