QuakerQuaker

Primitive Christianity Revived, Again

I attended a large Meeting today, surrounded by good people talking a lot about "Love" but saying nothing about "God."

And later a committee meeting, in which people talked about "being effective" but again couldn't bring the "G word" to their lips-- and when I brought that up, several people there there were eager to shut me up and render me more 'peaceful'-- but some responses got me wondering...

Later, at home reading a Ram Dass book, a couple of things struck me. One was a story about a time when he'd been really disturbed about people not meeting his expectations-- which he was also having trouble meeting.

And then there was this, apropos my own spiritual life lately...

"What, in fact, is the point of any of these practices, if we already are [Brahma]? They're to get rid of whatever in us prevents us from knowing who we are at this moment. See, from a practical point of view, we're faced with an interesting paradox. At one level of our intellectual understanding, we know that we already have all the riches-- we know that we are the atman, that we are the Buddha, that we are free. We know all that. But if we look inside, we'll notice that although we know it, we somehow don't believe it. ... All of [these practices], by one route or another, are designed to get around that roadblock between our knowing and our believing."

At least this points up, for me, much of the difficulty of talking about God.

I used to think that "knowing" God was obviously better than "believing in" God, because it does mean direct experience rather than "pretending to believe something you really don't."

But confronted with people who have been socially conditioned to avoid God-talk, knowing they're violating the accepted consensus view of Rationality&Reasonableness if they allow it any credence, it sometimes feels a lot safer not to risk "offering pearls to the poor hungry swine." Even for me.

It may be that I'm just a bit more "out" about "Theism-- the love that dares not speak its name" [these days] than some people...

We all have to struggle between our initial "common sense" and recognition of God at work in, around, & through us... and while Friends are supposed to embody a certain consistency, some of the more fruitful influences may just need to work covertly within our inconsistencies, for now...

Views: 291

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What if God wanted this Meeting to wait for 5 years before hearing His voice? The Israelites wandered for 40 years in the desert -- are we so much better than they? In waiting to hear the Inner voice, it must be said that we wait on God's time. "To everything there is a season" means many things, but it certainly means that we don't plant when the ground is lying fallow, but lying fallow is not a bad thing to do.

Waiting is not inactivity. It is very active. It doesn't look like much, but it isn't apathy.

Dr. Bruce R. Arnold said:

> ....In waiting to hear the Inner voice, it must be said that we wait on God's time...

I'd put it, rather: that this "God's time" is not some arbitrary decision, but what God's wisdom recognizes as the time people will need to "ripen",  for that "voice" to work according to God's purposes.

People's efforts to hurry that time... can just be part of that ripening process, whether it's working towards their own ripening or somebody else's. I've had all sorts of people telling me things I didn't understand at the time-- but later I recognized them as belonging to God's "voice."

"The Harmonious Hand is now holding

Lord Krishna's ring, the eagle's wing,

the voice of mother, everything..."

[Incredible String Band ~ 1968]

Indeed those things have happened, and as Beth pointed out, Christians can be some of the most hypocritical people going.....liberals as much as fundamentalists. But keep in mind that those things were done by people who had strayed from or warped teachings. Capitalism as we know it could not have existed if Christians had not begun to ignore teachings on moneylending when they began to drift away from tradition in favour of "enlightenment". Muslims are forced by their beliefs to be both more cautious and inventive in finding ways to get capital investments because they didn't just chuck the whole idea  when it got inconvenient.

Because we are  Westerners, we tend to see the world with us at the centre. Because Christianity is the majority religion here, historically and still, we see it's faults up close and personal....whereas the flaws of other faiths are a bit more vague and shadowy. Excepting perhaps the Taoists, every faith has fought with some other it sought to replace, whether physically or idealogically. Every faith has battled heresies and factionalism...indeed, some of the worst battles in any religion may be invisible to outsiders, as they are against other sects and varients within the fold. We see the horrible onging battles between Catholics and Protestants because they are on our doorstep, and miss the ones between Sunnis and Shias much less between Satmar Hasidim and Lubavitcher Hasidim (or Messianic Lubavitchers vs non-Messianic Lubavitchers). I suspect that people in other religions feel burdened by their changing God concepts too, and were it not for the fact that we have so much power and control and export our problems all over the globe, they would probably utterly fail to notice our issues.

Because we are post-enlightenment and post-modern secular humanists who distrust and are suspicious of religion and it's role in starting wars, we tend to attribute to religion many battles in which the real cause is political, cultural, social or economic. For example the oft cited "Irish troubles" which actually began many centuries ago when both sides were equally both Christian and Catholic. Religion is often the bulwark against letting in unwanted social changes that are difficult to fight directly...what the people are truly defending is not the idealogy but the lifestyle that keeps things sane in an often insane world.

Ray McIntyre said:

Very few of those religions, Karen, carry quite the burden that it does in Christian circles. Need I remind followers of the Prince of Peace of the wars started in His name? Who told the rich young ruler to "give all he had to the poor", how much damage has been done to nations and peoples under the guise of Christianity-endorsed rampant capitalism?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Quakers

About QuakerQuaker

QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.

Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List

Support:

Make a One-Time Online Donation (Paypal)

Make a $10 Monthly Recurring Donation

Advertise

Latest Activity

Howard Brod replied to Missy's discussion 'Where's the Quaker in Quaker?'
"I love Jesus and his teachings based on love and forgiveness, and my understanding of that message…"
2 hours ago
Olivia replied to Margaret Banford's discussion 'What type of Ministries....' in the group Quaker Ministry
"Hi Margaret! I just saw your questions.   I expect quakers believe everyone is a …"
3 hours ago
Olivia joined QuakerQuaker's group
Thumbnail

Quaker Ministry

Quaker ministry community, resource guide and discussion board. What happens at Friends worship and…See More
3 hours ago
Olivia commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'The Reach of Divinity'
"Thank you for this passage, James. Forrest, I don't disagree with your sense that evil is not…"
8 hours ago
Laura Ann Harris joined QuakerQuaker's group
Thumbnail

Quaker Books

Share your favorite Quaker books, start book reading groups and find Friends who share your love of…See More
10 hours ago
Irene Lape posted blog posts
12 hours ago
David Nelson Seaman replied to Karen Mercer's discussion 'Coming Apart'
"This thread is a good one, and quite timely when one considers the general malaise of the current…"
15 hours ago
James C Schultz commented on Doug Bennett's blog post 'The Reach of Divinity'
"While we have the capacity for good, there is no question we have the capacity for evil. …"
yesterday
roland heath shared QuakerQuaker's group on Facebook
yesterday
Marcie Tillett replied to Helen Gibbs's discussion 'Headcovering - finding a way to do this as a modern Plain'
"Hello Helen, I began wearing a cover full time in November of last year and I also wear modern…"
yesterday
roland heath joined QuakerQuaker's group
Thumbnail

Liberal Quakers

Liberal Friends practice waiting worship and emphasize community and the authority of the Inner…See More
yesterday
roland heath shared a profile on Facebook
yesterday

© 2012   Created by QuakerQuaker.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service