I attended a large Meeting today, surrounded by good people talking a lot about "Love" but saying nothing about "God."

And later a committee meeting, in which people talked about "being effective" but again couldn't bring the "G word" to their lips-- and when I brought that up, several people there there were eager to shut me up and render me more 'peaceful'-- but some responses got me wondering...

Later, at home reading a Ram Dass book, a couple of things struck me. One was a story about a time when he'd been really disturbed about people not meeting his expectations-- which he was also having trouble meeting.

And then there was this, apropos my own spiritual life lately...

"What, in fact, is the point of any of these practices, if we already are [Brahma]? They're to get rid of whatever in us prevents us from knowing who we are at this moment. See, from a practical point of view, we're faced with an interesting paradox. At one level of our intellectual understanding, we know that we already have all the riches-- we know that we are the atman, that we are the Buddha, that we are free. We know all that. But if we look inside, we'll notice that although we know it, we somehow don't believe it. ... All of [these practices], by one route or another, are designed to get around that roadblock between our knowing and our believing."

At least this points up, for me, much of the difficulty of talking about God.

I used to think that "knowing" God was obviously better than "believing in" God, because it does mean direct experience rather than "pretending to believe something you really don't."

But confronted with people who have been socially conditioned to avoid God-talk, knowing they're violating the accepted consensus view of Rationality&Reasonableness if they allow it any credence, it sometimes feels a lot safer not to risk "offering pearls to the poor hungry swine." Even for me.

It may be that I'm just a bit more "out" about "Theism-- the love that dares not speak its name" [these days] than some people...

We all have to struggle between our initial "common sense" and recognition of God at work in, around, & through us... and while Friends are supposed to embody a certain consistency, some of the more fruitful influences may just need to work covertly within our inconsistencies, for now...

Views: 301

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

What if God wanted this Meeting to wait for 5 years before hearing His voice? The Israelites wandered for 40 years in the desert -- are we so much better than they? In waiting to hear the Inner voice, it must be said that we wait on God's time. "To everything there is a season" means many things, but it certainly means that we don't plant when the ground is lying fallow, but lying fallow is not a bad thing to do.

Waiting is not inactivity. It is very active. It doesn't look like much, but it isn't apathy.

Dr. Bruce R. Arnold said:

> ....In waiting to hear the Inner voice, it must be said that we wait on God's time...

I'd put it, rather: that this "God's time" is not some arbitrary decision, but what God's wisdom recognizes as the time people will need to "ripen",  for that "voice" to work according to God's purposes.

People's efforts to hurry that time... can just be part of that ripening process, whether it's working towards their own ripening or somebody else's. I've had all sorts of people telling me things I didn't understand at the time-- but later I recognized them as belonging to God's "voice."

"The Harmonious Hand is now holding

Lord Krishna's ring, the eagle's wing,

the voice of mother, everything..."

[Incredible String Band ~ 1968]

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Tip Jar

It takes many hours a month to sift through hundreds of websites to come up with this daily curated list of the best of the Quaker web. If you learn more about Friends and find joy and spiritual growth in the conversations these links provide, please consider supporting the ministry with a monthly subscription.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

roland heath replied to Susann's discussion 'An Oxford Story'
"2 things at least in the states many have fought , many resisted, some served as medics, some…"
2 hours ago
Paula Deming replied to Susann's discussion 'An Oxford Story'
"You wrote: (This sounds confusing, I'm afraid.) Not at all. It sounds like you found a lovely…"
8 hours ago
Susann replied to Susann's discussion 'An Oxford Story'
"So, another sequel (triquel? Quadriquel?) to the story. I finally went to my local meeting for…"
9 hours ago
Susann replied to Susann's discussion 'An Oxford Story'
"Dear Mick Henry, thank you so much, I enjoyed reading about your Tolkien angle (or Quaker angle to…"
11 hours ago
Susann replied to Susann's discussion 'An Oxford Story'
"Dear Paula, thank you for your encouraging words - it's always wonderful to realize that…"
11 hours ago
Irene Lape posted a blog post

Daily Old Testament and Early Christian Writings: Numbers 25-26 and Origen's De Principiis: Preface 9-10

Numbers 25 – Israel is encamped at Shittim (at the foot of the mountains in northeaster part of…See More
18 hours ago
Stephanie Stuckwisch commented on N. Jeanne Burns's blog post 'What of God's Law?'
"Nearly 20 years ago, my meeting decided to take marriages under our care based on the relationship…"
yesterday
Stephanie Stuckwisch commented on Randy Oftedahl's blog post 'What Divides Us and What Unites Us'
"Very well said...or written."
yesterday

About QuakerQuaker

QuakerQuaker is a community of Friends exploring Primitive Christianity Revived: plain witness, ministry, beliefs. Quaker blogs, photos, videos & gatherings. Learn More.

Subscribe in a reader
Get daily emails
Facebook
iTunes / Podcast
Twitter / Twitter Quaker List

 

Advertise:

Learn about QQ Advertising

Place an Order

The QuakerQuaker Audience

Quakers

© 2013   Created by QuakerQuaker.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service