Portland is very Asian.  Some of the terms used in theology might need fine tuning if we're using them to classify beliefs.

If I believe in reincarnation, that's life after death right?  This life is the after life, i.e. the next life after the last one.

If I believe in intelligent yet invisible beings, call them demons or metaphysical processes, but not in any single "one" at the top of the food chain, governing the whole show (a monarchy), does that make me an atheist?

A lot of Asian belief systems have room for deities and being reborn into next lives.  The Westerners tend to sing about a King or Lord and sound more feudal.  Yet both Eastern and Western true believers are into invisible realms and extra-human intelligence.

I'm guessing the cultural anthropologists, if not the theologians, have a more elaborate taxonomy for labeling belief systems.  To my ears, it sounds wrong to label a belief system that includes after lives and multiple deities as "atheistic" or "a brand of atheism".

The term "pagan" has come to seem quaint and archaic, but I know some have adopted it as a branding token.

In the old days, believers in "the unseen" might have been a religious category, but these days "the unseen" encompasses phenomena detected through instrumentation.  Science embraces the unseen, the extrasensory, but we seem to have a problem equating science with religion.  Why?

I'm mostly programmed to think in English when thinking with words, and my impression is English is cram-packed with obsolete nomenclature and out-0f-date ideas (e.g. "race" as in "the seven races of man").  I'm highly suspicious of English, yet it's all I have.

Views: 48

Reply to This

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Arnold Van Wie updated their profile
8 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Kirby Urner's blog post 'Friendly Infrastructure: Two Exhibits'
1st day (Sun)
Kirby Urner posted a blog post

Friendly Infrastructure: Two Exhibits

[ EXHIBIT 1: Recent posting to npym-it-discuss, a listserv for those in NPYM interesting in yakking…See More
1st day (Sun)
Mike Shell posted a discussion
6th day (Fri)
Patricia Dallmann commented on Patricia Dallmann's blog post 'A Review of Traditional Quaker Christianity'
"Christopher, I'm glad to hear that you've gotten both books. Though they're…"
4th day (Wed)
Christopher Hatton commented on Patricia Dallmann's blog post 'A Review of Traditional Quaker Christianity'
"Thank you Patricia, I now see the difference, and I also now have both books."
9th month 18
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

The Christian Quaker by: William Rogers - Complete web and pdf versions.

In the year 1680, William Rogers published “The Christian Quaker Distinguished from the Apostate…See More
9th month 12
Keith Saylor commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'Online Version of William Rogers 1680 text "The Christian Quaker..."'
"Finally, I’ve brought this project to a point where I can publish the a first (by me)…"
9th month 12

© 2018   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service