Dear Friends:


I'm interested in starting a group here at QuakerQuaker on quietism.  The focus would be on the quietist insights of the Quaker tradition and recovering that focus.  I'm personally interested in a more contemplative, less political, approach to the Quaker tradition and have found the Quietist heritage to be a rich resource for such an approach.


Are any others interested in such a Group?  Also, it is not clear to me how to start a Group at QuakerQuaker.  So a little 'how to' would be appreciated.






Views: 249

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I'm very interested in the theology behind Quietism, but I don't like the 18th --19th century implementation.

Thanks, Michael, for your response.  I wonder if you could be more specific regarding what you mean by 'implementation'?  I'm not really very clear about how the view worked out in practice.  Like you, I'm very attracted to quietist theology.






During the Quietist period, Quakers turned in on themselves and imploded.  Not only did they stop expanding, but they also started kicking everyone out who was not respectable enough...  You could be disowned for not attending meeting, visiting another church, getting married outside of meeting, attending a marriage outside of meeting, associating with undesirable characters, being undesirable characters.  Seems almost everyone we run across has ancestors who used to be quakers but were kicked out.  


I like the idea of waiting on God, and relying of God instead of on human strength... but, I would not want to go back to the 18th or 19th century. 

We have heard that many early Friends communities went to great extents to separate themselves from the world.    This included a lot of disownments.  We are right to recoil from this practice.  It suggests an authority to separate goats from sheep.  This sort of authority does not belong to anyone on earth. 


But it is not clear to me that this tendency grew from Quietist theology.  Howard Brinton defines Quietism this way: "Quietism is the doctrine that every self-centered trait or activity must be suppressed or quieted in order that the divine may find unopposed entrance to the soul" (Page 66 Friends for 300 years).  If he is right, then I would not want to place disownments at the door of Quietist theology.


However, I must admit that when I did a little research before posting this reply, I found that no one defined Quaker Quietism as concisely as Howard Brinton did.  Many authors assumed that I knew what Quietism was and assigned a negative connotation to it.  My suspicion is that Quietism is blamed for more than it is responsible for.


@Chip -- I make the same assumption.  I am attracted to Quietism -- I love the idea of waiting on God, praying, and obeying... giving God all the glory.  I don't want to work on my own.  I do not want to get ahead of God -- No matter how active I become, I want my activity steeped in Quietism.  if I am called to preach -- I want to preach what God gives me -- and not for myself...  I don't want to get in God's way.


Unfortunately -- whenever we say Quietism, people start remembering when the overseers came to people and found them "not in a state of mind to give satisfaction."  and when they came again to "inform them of the testification against them and the right to appeal."  I agree -- this enforced conformity... this resistance to any change -- even if it was God breathed life was not true quietism but pride (which is a self centered trait)... but, when we talk about quietist quakers we think of the actions of the meetings -- not of the extraordinary saints (such as John Woolman -- who I admire).

Friend Chip:


Thanks for posting so succinctly a point that has been growing in importance for me.  I have noticed that when Quakers today refer to Quietism they often seem to associate Quietism with a stance of exclusivism and the practices which Michael Jay referred to in his post.  Personally, I do not see any connection between Quietist works and that kind of behavior.  When I read 'A Guide to True Peace' there is nothing in it that would lead to these kinds of manifestations.  Unless someone can show me that the Quakers who were busy excluding people who had 'gone astray' were directly inspired by Quietist philosophy or views, I would tend to regard this association as a misguided one.


I like Brinton's definition and I think it is a really good start.  I wasn't aware of it so thanks for posting it.




Reply to Discussion


Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? Our costs run to about $50/month. If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

Latest Activity

Kirby Urner commented on Olaf Radicke's blog post 'It's time for to move to Mastodon'
"Yeah I'm on Mastodon through being a Subgenius (as well as Quaker).  It's a fine…"
22 hours ago
Kirby Urner posted a video

Networking Among Friends

In celebration of CJ's comprehensivity program & community
22 hours ago
Olaf Radicke commented on Olaf Radicke's blog post 'It's time for to move to Mastodon'
"An helpful how to about following hashtags:"
Olaf Radicke commented on Olaf Radicke's blog post 'It's time for to move to Mastodon'
"Hi Martin! Thanks for the answer and the explanation. We already follow each other on Mastodon. I…"
2nd day (Mon)
Patricia Dallmann posted a blog post


The Gadarene demoniac (Mark 5:1-20) is the subject of a new post at…See More
2nd day (Mon)
Roderick Bedingfield updated their profile
2nd day (Mon)
Martin Kelley commented on Olaf Radicke's blog post 'It's time for to move to Mastodon'
"Hi Olaf, The Ning platform which uses has mostly frozen in features and to upgrade…"
2nd day (Mon)
Olaf Radicke posted a blog post

It's time for to move to Mastodon

I like the approach of to connect people. But I think it is time that…See More
1st day (Sun)

© 2022   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service