I have picked up a new (to me) book — or rather I have downloaded it onto my e-reader.

It is by somebody named Leslie Stevenson and it is called Open to New Light: Quaker Spirituality in Historical and Philosophical Context.

I was wondering if anyone else has had any experience with this book?

Views: 67

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Hello, David McKay!I haven't read the new book.  For better or for worse, I worry more about our closed attitude toward "old" light!

My work lately has been directed at describing and analyzing the traditional Conservative Quaker faith and inquiring about its relationship to current (especially Biblical) scholarship and church history, all with a good dose of critical evaluation.

Having expressed these reservations, I would like to know more about the author's take on Quaker spirituality.  Groan, another book to buy!

So thus far (I'm not very far in yet) we have the preface — which seems a fairly reductionist approach to mapping out the territory of the book. He is defining "spirituality" in terms of seven categories derived analytically from… someplace. His seven categories make perfect sense I'm just not convinced of the method there and I would probably want to add stuff to it. But that's just the preface and he's obviously got the training of philosopher rather than a student of spirituality per se.

Chapter 1 begins with the ancient Greeks. He's doing a historical as well as a philosophical analysis of the subject matter. And his focus so far has been Plato and Socrates. We seems to take from Socrates is an insistence that inquiry be open ended. He also notes Socrates claim to hear a voice which never told him what to do but often told him what not to do.

If I were to predict where this is going to go — and he doesn't seem to be trying to hold his cards close to his chest — I would say that he's going to argue that Quakerism — whether or not you buy the whole inner light thing — is a viable and even preferable spiritual path simply because the doctrine of inner light tends to result in people who are going to be open-minded about new learnings.

But as I said — I'm not very far along yet.

Of course light isn't new.  It just takes time to reach us from its source. 

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Kirby Urner replied to Sarah Kirby's discussion '"A Good Quaker is Hard To Find"'
"I see Quakers collectively as mostly bumbling, well-intentioned, but somewhat clueless. What…"
3 hours ago
Kirby Urner commented on Earlham School of Religion's blog post 'Preparing for war: Are we ready?'
"One reason Quakers are no longer strong in business, compared to late 1700s (a time of peak…"
3 hours ago
Forrest Curo left a comment for C.W.Baldwin
"Might I suggest a transcendent Subject who makes up those three partners so we'll have…"
7th day (Sat)
C.W.Baldwin updated their profile
7th day (Sat)
Bob Runyan posted a discussion

Survey on Quaker Meeting for Worship

What do you do in meeting for worship? What are you looking for there? Are you finding it? Take the…See More
6th day (Fri)
Bob Runyan posted an event

Daily Online Meeting for Worship at Your computer!

7th mo. 21, 2017 at 7:30am to 12th mo. 31, 2017 at 8am
Ben Lomond Quaker Center hosts a daily online meeting for worship 7:30-8:00 AM Pacific Time at …See More
6th day (Fri)
huw meredydd owen updated their profile
6th day (Fri)
Mac Broussard updated their profile
6th day (Fri)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service