[and if I'm confused about this, I'm probably not alone]:

 

What is the relation between God, "Christ", and that person named 'Jesus'?

 

Please feel free to use whatever terminology works best for what you have to say... though I suspect we'll have a wide range here[?]

Views: 45

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Christ, the Logos, the Wisdom of God, the Eternal Manifestation of God; Jesus, the Incarnation of that Wisdom, the One who came to Set Us Straight.

But then, as Rufus Jones said, "Whatever your mind comes at, I tell you flat, God is not that!" 

Well, I tend to like Rufus, but I've found too many other people using the inadequacy of human intellect-- to justify reducing God, in practice, from "beyond what we can fully conceive" to "less than we have conceived, and do conceive!"

 

What you said in the first paragraph makes sense and sounds right to me.

 

How to consider various other Christian ideas... ie, that after Jesus' death, God put him in charge of the world? Just another one of numerous misunderstandings people have arrived at over the centuries? Or... I like this better:  a reflection of people coming to understand that God is like Jesus, not like their their worst fears.

 

Having found that God really is like that (as Jesus happens to say here & there) I've tended to wonder, both about the forms Christianity has taken-- and the follies people are even more likely to embrace when they dismiss Christianity.

I'm not sure if I understand your question exactly, Forrest, but I have always understood this relation according to what the first chapter of the Gospel of John describes.

kinfolk

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Forrest: You have packed some heavy judgments into two short paragraphs, with no or very meager…"
23 hours ago
Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Perhaps, then, lack of "faith" (as people typically misconceive it) is less of a barrier…"
yesterday
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"When God takes the initiative, even the recalcitrant can be converted.  With God, all things…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Um, where were we? Thanks, however, for that last example of how not to read scripture. If it were…"
yesterday
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"I don't really have a sophisticated definition of "nontheist" to offer.  I…"
yesterday
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello William, Thank you for that important correction. The specific quote that prompted my…"
yesterday
William F Rushby replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello, Keith! "Atheist" is now a naughty word that is not politically correct! …"
5th day (Thu)
Keith Saylor replied to Forrest Curo's discussion 'Scriptures: Can't do with them; can't do without them?'
"Hello William, When you reflect upon another another person as atheist, how are you using that…"
5th day (Thu)

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service