Iran is officially anti-nuke weapon, a position not oft reported in US Jingo-Gringo media. Even many Quakers have never heard of the Ban Treaty (different from the Nonproliferation Treaty) aimed at criminalizing nuke WMDs. Is Iran on the right side of history then? More obedient to the Will of God?  I'd say so, yes, compared to the US, most certainly.

Views: 59

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Islamic states move to consolidate their anti-nuke WMD position:

Most USers remain clueless about all this geopolitical positioning, preferring out of habit to think more in this mold, in support of terrorism:

In Cascadia, we're fighting back. Washington DC is was too arrogant for too long. Respect is earned, not commanded.

Me on Facebook, Feb 4 2017:

Except for Pakistan, no officially Muslim state has nukes. We're born and raised in the US to think Iran wants nothing more than to "go for the gun" and suddenly have nukes, like in some cowboy Wild West movie. However those still in touch with reality see Iran has far more to gain by spearheading a global anti-nuke movement that sees non-proliferation as "not enough". Those doing any homework on this issue already know about (a) the lawsuit filed with the World Court by the Marshall Islands, denied a hearing and (b) the Ban Treaty, wending its way through the UN. If you've heard of neither of these actions, and think Iran is eager to have nuke weapons, welcome to the world of USA TV, a brainwashing machine of diminishing effectiveness but still pretty good at mind-control.

Reply to Discussion


Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.

You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Howard Brod added a discussion to the group Liberal Quakers

What Life in the Spirit Looks Like

It has always been the tendency of the human mind to subjugate spiritual things to the judgments,…See More
Sarah Kirby replied to Sarah Kirby's discussion 'Are we using the word "Radical" Correctly?'
"Thanks for your thoughts David. That is an interesting way to think about that. I will add it to my…"
David McKay replied to Sarah Kirby's discussion 'Are we using the word "Radical" Correctly?'
""Radical" has come to be used as a noun of late. In phrases like, "the protesters…"
Sarah Kirby posted a discussion

Are we using the word "Radical" Correctly?

My hubs and I dropped off your kids at Quaker Camp yesterday. And we kicked off our kid-free week…See More
Rita Juse-Cirkse updated their profile
Kirby Urner replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Mysticism: The 'Engine' of liberal Quakerism (anonymous article from a Quaker library)' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Also apropos, mentions Quaker Meeting:"
5th day (Thu)
Howard Brod commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'The Infallible Mark'
"It has always been the tendency of the human mind to subjugate spiritual things to the judgements,…"
6th month 20
Esther Gilbert liked Esther Gilbert's profile
6th month 20

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service