I just got back home from a weekend meeting of Quakers.  It was called a retreat but it was a meeting.  It had a leader not a clerk.  The Leader had expectations and a plan for the weekend.  At the end of the meeting it became apparent to me that what we had slipped into was using worship not to determine the will of the source of the light for us but, at best, how to get that source to serve as a means to accomplish what we want to accomplish.  We have slipped into a situation where we don't seem to be open to saying "but not my will but thine".   We all have ideas and expectations and goals which often flow from a vision from that source of light we all say we want to walk in, but even then we fail to put those ideas, expectations and goals on the shelf when we seek to enter the Light, we fail to wait expectantly for the Light to show us the next step involved with the Light's Vision entrusted to us and in doing so we co-opt that vision into our own vision.  Of course in too many cases it was always our vision and we only use Worship as a cover to do our thing.

Maybe we need to look around us and stop blaming God for the ills of society and ask how much, if any, of our existing Nationalism, Drug laws, international conglomerates and global policing are God's will and how much is ours?  Maybe it's time to focus our attention on one thing that the time is ripe for change and seek God's vision, ideas, expectations and goal for that one area and seek the Light fervently in that endeavor without splintering our power like a shot gun in a scattergun fashion.  Maybe it's time for us to be lasers of the Light?   What do you sense when you are in the light?  Don't get trapped with just responding from your experience with your thoughts, seek the light and then respond.  Let's see what flows.  Give the Light a chance to be real in and to this world we live in.  Pass on the need to respond to each other just as if you were in a meeting for worship and lets see where we are a week from now.   

Views: 206

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

So what has come to me out of the silence this week on this topic is that God doesn't have a will for Quakers.  He just has a will.  Like Keith says in his reply God just is.  He doesn't have a will for Quakers and a separate will for Catholics and a separate will for Muslims.  He just has a will.  What has also come to me is the scripture that says "God changeth not" which I take to mean His will doesn't change from day to day or year to year.  Which means His will is still to just Love our neighbor as ourself.  So if any group, Quakers or Baptists, etc, wants to do God's will they just have to love their neighbor and since Jesus already explained who our neighbor is that should be easy, except my mugged neighbor is not necessarily your mugged neighbor.  Anyone else care to share?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Kirby Urner replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Mysticism: The 'Engine' of liberal Quakerism (anonymous article from a Quaker library)' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Also apropos, mentions Quaker Meeting: http://controlroom.blogspot.com/2017/01/i-robot.html"
yesterday
Howard Brod commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'The Infallible Mark'
"It has always been the tendency of the human mind to subjugate spiritual things to the judgements,…"
4th day (Wed)
Esther Gilbert liked Esther Gilbert's profile
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Mysticism: The 'Engine' of liberal Quakerism (anonymous article from a Quaker library)' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I is amazing to me how pertinent and relevant your words are to my most recent blog post! It is…"
3rd day (Tue)
Keith Saylor posted a blog post

The Infallible Mark

The Infallible MarkStudies from "The Christian Quaker ..." by William Rogers (1680).Note: The…See More
3rd day (Tue)
Howard Brod replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Mysticism: The 'Engine' of liberal Quakerism (anonymous article from a Quaker library)' in the group Liberal Quakers
"Yes Keith, I had your same thought yesterday after reading Jim's comment regarding Anne…"
3rd day (Tue)
Jim Wilson commented on Jim Wilson's blog post 'Cambridge Platonists'
"Patricia, thanks for the post.  It will take some time for me to read it and then respond.…"
3rd day (Tue)
Patricia Dallmann commented on Jim Wilson's blog post 'Cambridge Platonists'
"Corrections: In the first reason that Whitehead  gives for why Platonists do not exalt Christ…"
3rd day (Tue)

© 2017   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service