*George Fox's Book of Miracles* and the Suppression of Early Quaker Enthusiasm

*George Fox's Book of Miracles* disappeared mysteriously during the early days of Quakerism, even though George Fox had left funds in his will for its publication.  The manuscript of Fox's journal was also edited heavily, to eliminate passages the second generation Friends found problematic.  In face of growing opposition from the government and the public, and intensifying persecution, the leadership of the early Quaker movement sought to eliminate extremism and indecorous behavior in meetings and on the street.  In so doing, they suppressed the charismatic character of original Quakerism.

Michele Lise Tartar gives an interesting account of this period in a lecture she gave at Haddonfiled Meeting (NJ): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbCs9sMwNiU   Her lecture may have a "New Age" and feminist flavor, but it is still well done.

Henry Cadbury discovered Fox's Book of Miracles in his research on George Fox, but the actual book was nowhere to be found.  Cadbury drew on Fox's extensive writings, and probably those of others, to reconstruct a version of the Book of Miracles.  It is now in print.

This came to mind as I reflected on Hye Sung Francis's third installment of his essay on "Quakerism as a Charismatic Tradition."  https://hyesungfrancis.wordpress.com/2015/09/04/quakerism-as-a-char...  The title of the third part of his essay is "Quakerism as a Charismatic Tradition: A Prophetic Church"

Views: 1047

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

More accounts of Quaker miracles from Hal and Joan Worthington's website:  http://www.hallvworthington.com/George_Fox_Selections/foxmiracles.html

Bill -- I'm not sure about the edition, but Quakers Uniting in Publications published this several years ago, I think with Cadbury's introduction. 



William F Rushby said:

More accounts of Quaker miracles from Hal and Joan Worthington's website:  http://www.hallvworthington.com/George_Fox_Selections/foxmiracles.html

What got published was a reconstructed summary; the book itself (if you listen to the talk) was lost; and much of the material that hadn't been discarded was heavily inked over.

The trouble is, we still haven't been ready for the healing charisma, the realization of God's presence and effective mercy, that produced the healings attributed to George Fox, Naylor, and to Jesus before them.

Jesus accepted his personal defeat, because the people of his time were overall not ready to live under The Kingdom, while a violent victory over his enemies would have negated God's purposes.

I think that Fox eventually realized, reluctantly, the same thing about the people of his own time -- which accounts for a large part of his hostility towards Naylor, who was willing to accept a martyrdom for himself which Fox could not accept coming as heavily on their followers as he anticipated.

But now, I think, we're faced with an odd combination of circumstances: more oppression and violence than ever before, with more widespread awareness of its needlessness and futility than ever before --

with the 'destroyers of the Earth' turning out to be just plain folks like us, all around us and even including us -- destroying everything God made for us by merely living the kinds of lives we consider normal.

It seems like either The Kingdom arrives 'in power' very soon, or life as we know it will become untenable. That may have something to do with these 'impossible' and 'unacceptable' divine interventions once more coming to light?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"I'd rather encourage people to examine the Bible sympathetically than discourage them from…"
yesterday
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Instead of floundering and thrashing around to find a way to conceptualize God, Turn to the Bible…"
yesterday
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Masculine _nouns_? A word like "Godd-ess" would imply that 'God's were normally…"
2nd day (Mon)
Patty Quinn replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"To hear God referred to in masculine nouns and pronouns feels to me like a slap in the face to the…"
2nd day (Mon)
Forrest Curo replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"It's probably best to talk about many Biblical concepts of God. What they have in common is…"
7th day (Sat)
William F Rushby replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Some Christians try to stick closely to the Biblical concept of God.  Of course, we know that…"
7th day (Sat)
Thomas Maxwell replied to Thomas Maxwell's discussion 'Concept of Diety'
"Yes I agree. I believe we can be fluid in our conception of our Higher Power. I love Kuan Yin but I…"
6th day (Fri)
Ronald Gordon updated their profile
2nd month 19

© 2021   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service