*George Fox's Book of Miracles* and the Suppression of Early Quaker Enthusiasm

*George Fox's Book of Miracles* disappeared mysteriously during the early days of Quakerism, even though George Fox had left funds in his will for its publication.  The manuscript of Fox's journal was also edited heavily, to eliminate passages the second generation Friends found problematic.  In face of growing opposition from the government and the public, and intensifying persecution, the leadership of the early Quaker movement sought to eliminate extremism and indecorous behavior in meetings and on the street.  In so doing, they suppressed the charismatic character of original Quakerism.

Michele Lise Tartar gives an interesting account of this period in a lecture she gave at Haddonfiled Meeting (NJ): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbCs9sMwNiU   Her lecture may have a "New Age" and feminist flavor, but it is still well done.

Henry Cadbury discovered Fox's Book of Miracles in his research on George Fox, but the actual book was nowhere to be found.  Cadbury drew on Fox's extensive writings, and probably those of others, to reconstruct a version of the Book of Miracles.  It is now in print.

This came to mind as I reflected on Hye Sung Francis's third installment of his essay on "Quakerism as a Charismatic Tradition."  https://hyesungfrancis.wordpress.com/2015/09/04/quakerism-as-a-char...  The title of the third part of his essay is "Quakerism as a Charismatic Tradition: A Prophetic Church"

Views: 960

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

More accounts of Quaker miracles from Hal and Joan Worthington's website:  http://www.hallvworthington.com/George_Fox_Selections/foxmiracles.html

Bill -- I'm not sure about the edition, but Quakers Uniting in Publications published this several years ago, I think with Cadbury's introduction. 



William F Rushby said:

More accounts of Quaker miracles from Hal and Joan Worthington's website:  http://www.hallvworthington.com/George_Fox_Selections/foxmiracles.html

What got published was a reconstructed summary; the book itself (if you listen to the talk) was lost; and much of the material that hadn't been discarded was heavily inked over.

The trouble is, we still haven't been ready for the healing charisma, the realization of God's presence and effective mercy, that produced the healings attributed to George Fox, Naylor, and to Jesus before them.

Jesus accepted his personal defeat, because the people of his time were overall not ready to live under The Kingdom, while a violent victory over his enemies would have negated God's purposes.

I think that Fox eventually realized, reluctantly, the same thing about the people of his own time -- which accounts for a large part of his hostility towards Naylor, who was willing to accept a martyrdom for himself which Fox could not accept coming as heavily on their followers as he anticipated.

But now, I think, we're faced with an odd combination of circumstances: more oppression and violence than ever before, with more widespread awareness of its needlessness and futility than ever before --

with the 'destroyers of the Earth' turning out to be just plain folks like us, all around us and even including us -- destroying everything God made for us by merely living the kinds of lives we consider normal.

It seems like either The Kingdom arrives 'in power' very soon, or life as we know it will become untenable. That may have something to do with these 'impossible' and 'unacceptable' divine interventions once more coming to light?

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Support Us

Did you know that QuakerQuaker is 100% reader supported? If you think this kind of outreach and conversation is important, please support it with a monthly subscription or one-time gift.


You can also make a one-time donation.

Latest Activity

Diane Kerchner liked QuakerQuaker's group Plainness & Simplicity
10th month 21
Diane Kerchner liked William F Rushby's discussion Recapturing Initiative for Conservative Friends
10th month 21
Rainer Möller posted a blog post

Quakers unto the Civil War

My personal impression is that Quakers, like all abolitionists, enthusiastically took part in the…See More
10th month 19
Rainer Möller replied to William F Rushby's discussion 'Two Narratives in American Society'
"Following this review Macaes' seems to say that before our times, when "Liberalism"…"
10th month 19
William F Rushby replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"I think there is a relatively small elite at the top of the power structure of unprogrammed…"
10th month 18
Forrest Curo replied to Howard Brod's discussion 'Why do Liberal Friends not Record Ministers or Spiritual Gifts?' in the group Liberal Quakers
"The main Quaker hierarchy today are those who learn to manipulate "Quaker Process"."
10th month 18
Keith Saylor commented on Keith Saylor's blog post 'In the Life itself the need for prophets and prophecies is fulfilled.'
"Your testimony to the witness of immanent power and presence of the inshining Light and Life is a…"
10th month 18
Karl Malchut liked QuakerQuaker's group Liberal Quakers
10th month 17

© 2020   Created by QuakerQuaker.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service